Liverpool Thread - 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
SebastianBlue said:
Short version: Nedum interviewed Klopp for ESPN right after the Wolves match and asked a few probing questions about what exactly happened during the match and, in response, Klopp pontificated, including saying something to the effect of "I am not sure you have played football but..." to preface a little snide rebuttal to Nedum's questions. He was obviously annoyed with having to answer for Liverpool's performance over and over (Nedum's was just one of many interviews), which is understandable, but the way he let it come out and the way he condescended to Nedum (who had a much more successful playing career than Klopp) was out of order.

For me, it was needlessly cuntish behaviour.

It's obviously not the first time for Klopp. But the way the media tries to bury it and maintain this 'every bloke' image of Klopp is just infuriating.
Click to expand...
Would that be the same Nedum Onuoha who made 377 professional appearances during his career, 48 more than 'The Amazingly Dentate One' himself achieved? (and that's not including the additional 21 England U21 appearances Nedum made)

I understand that Klopp's middle name is 'Norbert'.. I think 'herbert' would be more appropriate (..while some fellow Blues, no doubt, would prefer to suggest a rude diminutive of 'Norbert'..)
 
Last edited:
Paladin said:
Good for Wolves. Well done. The FA / PGMOL now have 48 hours or whatever it might be too concoct a plausible set of explanations that fit the circumstances. Let's see them trying to squirm their way out of this one.
Click to expand...

Both of them will be in cahoots, come up with a face saving excuse, and worm their way out of this awkward problem. Liverpool will,stay silent as usual.
 
Paladin said:
Good for Wolves. Well done. The FA / PGMOL now have 48 hours or whatever it might be too concoct a plausible set of explanations that fit the circumstances. Let's see them trying to squirm their way out of this one.
Click to expand...

And if the excuse isnt good enough hopefully wolves dont let it lie.

If they confirm a blind spot than the rest of the premier league clubs should want answers as to why Anfield isnt up to standard.

City should being putting more pressure on the authorities regarding the dippers throwing things at us fans.
 
Paladin said:
Good for Wolves. Well done. The FA / PGMOL now have 48 hours or whatever it might be too concoct a plausible set of explanations that fit the circumstances. Let's see them trying to squirm their way out of this one.
Click to expand...
They will blame the lack of cameras. Apparently the BBC installed 17 cameras for the game whilst SKY install 30. End of explanation and end of discussion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.