Liverpool Thread - 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
Im no liverpool fan (im actually a city fan) but this wolves lack of camera isnt the first time weve seen it this season we saw it at the emirates when liverpool went there and their first goal saka (who got the assist) was off side but they didnt have an angle there neither the only difference was they let the goal stand at the emirates and they didnt at anfield.
 
I would like to see a camera on the linesman, because I haven't seen his flag go up in the clips I've seen.

Flags have a switch fitted so the linesman (person) can alert the referee (blind fucker) that they have seen something (nothing) happen without putting the flag up..

I really want them all mic'd up so we can all hear what they have seen
 
Short version: Nedum interviewed Klopp for ESPN right after the Wolves match and asked a few probing questions about what exactly happened during the match and, in response, Klopp pontificated, including saying something to the effect of "I am not sure you have played football but..." to preface a little snide rebuttal to Nedum's questions. He was obviously annoyed with having to answer for Liverpool's performance over and over (Nedum's was just one of many interviews), which is understandable, but the way he let it come out and the way he condescended to Nedum (who had a much more successful playing career than Klopp) was out of order.

For me, it was needlessly cuntish behaviour.

It's obviously not the first time for Klopp. But the way the media tries to bury it and maintain this 'every bloke' image of Klopp is just infuriating.
Nedum - 188 Premier League appearances, called up for Nigeria national team (but decided he wanted to try and get in the England team),

Klopp - 0 Bundesliga appearances.

Yes, Jürgen, he did play football.
 
Haha, I just got to the end and saw (@cheekybids @Barcon around 50 minutes)!

Thanks for proving I am not crazy as apparently I was the only blue on Earth that watched the interview live and ESPN have decided not to post it online (at least, nowhere I have been able to find). They even cut the 3-4 minutes the studio team spent joking about the interview with Nedum from any match videos posted online.

I still find it very difficult to believe they would have done that if Pep had acted the same way with a former Liverpool player interviewing him.

I still think you're crazy ; )

Cheers. You've gotta like Ned.
 
Still euphoric after our scintillating display on Sunday, just wondering if the slaughterers' playbook of excuses has been wheeled out yet? Perhaps that arsehole Robertson's been sanctioned for his latest thuggery?

Oh well, cheer up rodent eaters, this hopefully will be the worst ever defence for the bestest team to do half a quad. You odious twats!
 
At least one club has balls when it comes to this lot https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/64226524

I love this quote from the article: "The FA Cup tie at Anfield was effectively decided by a linesman error and VAR technology failure. How does this occur at a stadium regularly hosting Champions League matches and professionally trained match officials?" read the statement.
Wolves were also unhappy that Mohamed Salah's goal, which put Liverpool 2-1 ahead, was allowed to stand, despite the Egypt forward APPEARING to be in an offside position when the ball was played to him during the build-up.
=====
Appearing? At least 2ft off
 
Wolves were also unhappy that Mohamed Salah's goal, which put Liverpool 2-1 ahead, was allowed to stand, despite the Egypt forward APPEARING to be in an offside position when the ball was played to him during the build-up.
=====
Appearing? At least 2ft off

apparently, to the letter of the law, that Salah goal can be given as onside (phase of play, intentional this that and the other blah blah).

Thing is, and unbelievably i'm agreeing with Danny Murphy, that exact scenario is flagged offside, whether the ball even reaches Salah (or equivalent) or not, in the league every weekend up and down the football pyramid most of the time. Thereby showing we have either mass misinterpretation of a rule or, at the very least, total inconsistency.
 
Why have a flag then? Surely he/she is still required to put the flag up.
More to the point, why even have a linesman! From what I've read it was the referee who told him to put it up so he did (several seconds after the goal was scored) just so it could be checked by VAR. The linesman clearly didn't think it was offside but VAR then had to stick with his decision because the camera angles were shit. Ridiculous
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.