Liverpool Thread - 2022/23

[citymad]

They’re a deranged, angry mob and they seem to be getting more upset. I wouldn’t be surprised if they had another meltdown and caused another tragedy.

 

[Kamaro011]

This season PL intro still pissed me off, so biased towards dipper eventhough they didn't win PL last season. I mean WTF they are thinking.

 

[I'm With Stupid]

He's back...

 

[Bluekiwi]

Advanced Maths to a Dipper,

You sell 12000 tickets for a match, calculate by any means possible the number of fans that will get into the ground?

A major tragedy at a football match caused by Liverpool fans.
Show your calculations to prove the number of fans to blame is Zero.

You have the best Team, Best Manager, and Best Player in every position and still only win 1 League Title, explan how this is possible?

Liverpool sell 1 average Player for a ridiculous made up fee. The fee received then funds purchases 10 times its value, how is this possible without the use of Witchcraft.

Illustrate how 1 man with 1 spade digs 1 hole in Stanley Park and costs £50m

It would take one of them a lifetime to answer just one of those questions.

 

[cheekybids]

He's back...

There should be the equivalent of an ASBO for the internet.

 

[Bluekiwi]

The questions weren't that hard when I did "A"level maths.

"A" level maths question for scousers "How many hands does it take to dip in a bin?"
"O" level maths question for scousers "How many fingers on your right hand?"
"11-plus" level maths for scousers "How many thumbs on your left hand?"

 

[roy.or.r]

It’s funny how they don’t care about us at RAWK but their Palace post-match thread is filled with deluded fucks talking about us. Living rent free in their heads.

 

[goalmole]

I mean what the actual FCUK!

You've spelt FUCK wrong.

 

[Saddleworth2]

They did have an interesting thread about expected points, where someone classified games by the expected result and how much better or worse than those expected results the top six clubs were doing. So if they had us down for a draw at Arsenal, and we won, we'd be 2 points up.

So out of 38 games, they might say Liverpool would win 28, draw 7 and lose 3 for example. Any deviation from that would impact the expected points. There's 114 points available and I guess they were looking at Liverpool getting 94 on expected results. But those expected results would have seen wins at Fulham and v Palace. That means they're 4 off so far.

I understand that but I'm struggling with the rest. I can only assume they think that the more we win in the short term, the more we'll drop points over the longer term, as they're expecting us to drop, say, 20 over the season.

I’m a little troubled that you attempted to make sense of that ;-)

 

[TravisBickle]

Its frightening over there...you cant tell me they're not deranged...from the Palace thread...

" Worrying that we’ve spent 4 points from our 20 point reserve, hopefully we can regain 6 points so we’re up to 22 points. Man City have a bank of minus 4 points though so if they lose more points, a negative plus a negative is a positive. So ideally we need them to keep winning, it’d be annoying to see them increase that bank by losing games. If we take their average points total of the last two seasons, add our 20 point bank, delete their bank, and then maybe see if Arsenal or Spurs have a bank that we can borrow, then we can drop 24 more points"

That might just be the funniest/craziest thing I’ve ever read on a football forum