Liverpool Thread - 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
SebastianBlue said:
Haha, I just got to the end and saw (@cheekybids @Barcon around 50 minutes)!

Thanks for proving I am not crazy as apparently I was the only blue on Earth that watched the interview live and ESPN have decided not to post it online (at least, nowhere I have been able to find). They even cut the 3-4 minutes the studio team spent joking about the interview with Nedum from any match videos posted online.

I still find it very difficult to believe they would have done that if Pep had acted the same way with a former Liverpool player interviewing him.
Click to expand...

Substitute " impossible " for " very difficult " and you are dead right there SB.
 
At least one club has balls when it comes to this lot https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/64226524

I love this quote from the article: "The FA Cup tie at Anfield was effectively decided by a linesman error and VAR technology failure. How does this occur at a stadium regularly hosting Champions League matches and professionally trained match officials?" read the statement.
 
Eds said:
At least one club has balls when it comes to this lot https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/64226524

I love this quote from the article: "The FA Cup tie at Anfield was effectively decided by a linesman error and VAR technology failure. How does this occur at a stadium regularly hosting Champions League matches and professionally trained match officials?" read the statement.
Click to expand...

Too right that Wolves should lodge a formal complaint seeing that they were robbed of a justified win. Too many are expected to roll over and accept the difference in standard of refereeing that LFC receive from officials.

More clubs affected by the PiGMOL appropach to rags and dippers should kick up a massive fuss about the favoured treatment those two clubs get from the secretive organisation.
 
Eds said:
At least one club has balls when it comes to this lot https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/64226524

I love this quote from the article: "The FA Cup tie at Anfield was effectively decided by a linesman error and VAR technology failure. How does this occur at a stadium regularly hosting Champions League matches and professionally trained match officials?" read the statement.
Click to expand...
he wont be manager of wolves for long the media will be briefed and every negative will be found

clear n obvious
 
SebastianBlue said:
Haha, I just got to the end and saw (@cheekybids @Barcon around 50 minutes)!

Thanks for proving I am not crazy as apparently I was the only blue on Earth that watched the interview live and ESPN have decided not to post it online (at least, nowhere I have been able to find). They even cut the 3-4 minutes the studio team spent joking about the interview with Nedum from any match videos posted online.

I still find it very difficult to believe they would have done that if Pep had acted the same way with a former Liverpool player interviewing him.
Click to expand...
@SebastianBlue, what happened?
 
Colin Bells Boots said:
Too right that Wolves should lodge a formal complaint seeing that they were robbed of a justified win. Too many are expected to roll over and accept the difference in standard of refereeing that LFC receive from officials.

More clubs affected by the PiGMOL appropach to rags and dippers should kick up a massive fuss about the favoured treatment those two clubs get from the secretive organisation.
Click to expand...
Wolves were 10/1 to win that game an that’s where my £10 went Bent bastards
 
Nails said:
@SebastianBlue, what happened?
Click to expand...
Short version: Nedum interviewed Klopp for ESPN right after the Wolves match and asked a few probing questions about what exactly happened during the match and, in response, Klopp pontificated, including saying something to the effect of "I am not sure you have played football but..." to preface a little snide rebuttal to Nedum's questions. He was obviously annoyed with having to answer for Liverpool's performance over and over (Nedum's was just one of many interviews), which is understandable, but the way he let it come out and the way he condescended to Nedum (who had a much more successful playing career than Klopp) was out of order.

For me, it was needlessly cuntish behaviour.

It's obviously not the first time for Klopp. But the way the media tries to bury it and maintain this 'every bloke' image of Klopp is just infuriating.
 
SebastianBlue said:
Short version: Nedum interviewed Klopp for ESPN right after the Wolves match and asked a few probing questions about what exactly happened during the match and, in response, Klopp pontificated, including saying something to the effect of "I am not sure you have played football but..." to preface a little snide rebuttal to Nedum's questions. He was obviously annoyed with having to answer for Liverpool's performance over and over (Nedum's was just one of many interviews), which is understandable, but the way he let it come out and the way he condescended to Nedum (who had a much more successful playing career than Klopp) was out of order.

For me, it was needlessly cuntish behaviour.

It's obviously not the first time for Klopp. But the way the media tries to bury it and maintain this 'every bloke' image of Klopp is just infuriating.
Click to expand...

Media arselickers can't help themselves and are whores in reality.
 
SebastianBlue said:
Short version: Nedum interviewed Klopp for ESPN right after the Wolves match and asked a few probing questions about what exactly happened during the match and, in response, Klopp pontificated, including saying something to the effect of "I am not sure you have played football but..." to preface a little snide rebuttal to Nedum's questions. He was obviously annoyed with having to answer for Liverpool's performance over and over (Nedum's was just one of many interviews), which is understandable, but the way he let it come out and the way he condescended to Nedum (who had a much more successful playing career than Klopp) was out of order.

For me, it was needlessly cuntish behaviour.

It's obviously not the first time for Klopp. But the way the media tries to bury it and maintain this 'every bloke' image of Klopp is just infuriating.
Click to expand...
They did the same with the pisscan. His snarling contempt for the media was there for all to see when he was in charge at the swamp, yet when he 'retired' (ha, ha) the BBC in particular could scarcely contain their fawning, ingratiating, kow-towing when he was promoting that book of his.
 
SebastianBlue said:
Short version: Nedum interviewed Klopp for ESPN right after the Wolves match and asked a few probing questions about what exactly happened during the match and, in response, Klopp pontificated, including saying something to the effect of "I am not sure you have played football but..." to preface a little snide rebuttal to Nedum's questions. He was obviously annoyed with having to answer for Liverpool's performance over and over (Nedum's was just one of many interviews), which is understandable, but the way he let it come out and the way he condescended to Nedum (who had a much more successful playing career than Klopp) was out of order.

For me, it was needlessly cuntish behaviour.

It's obviously not the first time for Klopp. But the way the media tries to bury it and maintain this 'every bloke' image of Klopp is just infuriating.
Click to expand...
Would that be the same Nedum Onuoha who made 377 professional appearances during his career, 48 more than 'The Amazingly Dentate One' himself achieved? (and that's not including the additional 21 England U21 appearances Nedum made)

I understand that Klopp's middle name is 'Norbert'.. I think 'herbert' would be more appropriate (..while some fellow Blues, no doubt, would prefer to suggest a rude diminutive of 'Norbert'..)
 
Last edited:
Paladin said:
Good for Wolves. Well done. The FA / PGMOL now have 48 hours or whatever it might be too concoct a plausible set of explanations that fit the circumstances. Let's see them trying to squirm their way out of this one.
Click to expand...

Both of them will be in cahoots, come up with a face saving excuse, and worm their way out of this awkward problem. Liverpool will,stay silent as usual.
 
Paladin said:
Good for Wolves. Well done. The FA / PGMOL now have 48 hours or whatever it might be too concoct a plausible set of explanations that fit the circumstances. Let's see them trying to squirm their way out of this one.
Click to expand...

And if the excuse isnt good enough hopefully wolves dont let it lie.

If they confirm a blind spot than the rest of the premier league clubs should want answers as to why Anfield isnt up to standard.

City should being putting more pressure on the authorities regarding the dippers throwing things at us fans.
 
Paladin said:
Good for Wolves. Well done. The FA / PGMOL now have 48 hours or whatever it might be too concoct a plausible set of explanations that fit the circumstances. Let's see them trying to squirm their way out of this one.
Click to expand...
They will blame the lack of cameras. Apparently the BBC installed 17 cameras for the game whilst SKY install 30. End of explanation and end of discussion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top