Liverpool Thread - 2022/23

[goalmole]

The media have collectively lost their tongues right up the bin dippers's arses.

They've prevented English football being dominated by one club by......................

winning one Premier League title in 32 years.
Well done the dippers.

 

[cheekybids]

They've prevented English football being dominated by one club by......................

winning one Premier League title in 32 years.
Well done the dippers.

Don’t forget on 2 occasions they came 2nd……remarkable.

 

[bluethrunthru]

Don’t forget on 2 occasions they came 2nd……remarkable.

2nd being the new 1st?

 

[bluejon]

They really should be loving "state run" Manchester city showing the world that government run businesses can be much more successful than private businesses.

Proof that the public sector can perform just as well as the raw capitalism of liverpool and united, if not significantly better. Nice.

 

[bluejon]

They've prevented English football being dominated by one club by......................

winning one Premier League title in 32 years.
Well done the dippers.

End of the day, they need something to have a wank about. You accept what you're given.

 

[Nellies left peg]

Klipperty says they cannot compete with us when we go out and buy the best striker in the world.So what does he do? Oh yes he goes and spends nearly double on that twat Nunez. The dippers have spent an awful lot of money to be another Blackburn or Leicester

 

[blue b4 the moon]

They've prevented English football being dominated by one club by......................

winning one Premier League title in 32 years.
Well done the dippers.

Yeah but but only 1 point behind last season as I kept hearing from people with any UK accent over the summer.

Yeah a chasum as I kept pointing out, fancy being sooooo close again and just....not.....quite..... getting.....there..

 

[Saddleworth2]

from Barney Roney in the Guardian,

Money does come into this. Liverpool’s net transfer fee spend in the last four years has been £80m, compared with City’s £200m.

Thats just wrong. Liverpool Net Spend is greater than ours in the last 5 years. They are 9th and we are 10th in PL.
We really should not these lies go unchallenged.

9) Liverpool: £-216.61m
22/23: £-8.64m
21/22: £-51.71m (2nd)
20/21: £-58.91m (3rd)
19/20: £28.08m (Champions)
18/19: £-126.79m (2nd)

10) Manchester City: £-213.8m
22/23: £18.36m
21/22: £-36.63m (Champions)
20/21: £-90.14m (Champions)
19/20: £-79.67m (2nd)
18/19: £-18.89m (Champions)

 

[BerkshireBlue]

from Barney Roney in the Guardian,

Money does come into this. Liverpool’s net transfer fee spend in the last four years has been £80m, compared with City’s £200m.

Thats just wrong. Liverpool Net Spend is greater than ours in the last 5 years. They are 9th and we are 10th in PL.
We really should not these lies go unchallenged.

9) Liverpool: £-216.61m
22/23: £-8.64m
21/22: £-51.71m (2nd)
20/21: £-58.91m (3rd)
19/20: £28.08m (Champions)
18/19: £-126.79m (2nd)

10) Manchester City: £-213.8m
22/23: £18.36m
21/22: £-36.63m (Champions)
20/21: £-90.14m (Champions)
19/20: £-79.67m (2nd)
18/19: £-18.89m (Champions)

How's he got this fact wrong?? it's a simple calculation and basic journalism

 

[Saddleworth2]

How's he got this fact wrong?? it's a simple calculation and basic journalism

Its called lying.
Some find it very easy.