Liverpool Thread - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
chris85mcfc said:
Like I said, the Forest keeper was down for 4 minutes, and there were 5 lots of substitutions which I'm guessing they allow 30 seconds each for. Then you've just got your standard bits of stoppages in the game etc.

The extra minute in injury time was the Konate injury.

I genuinely can't think of a game where we should have had 8 or 9 minutes, but only got 3 or 4.
Click to expand...
Konate injury ffs.

He feigned a head injury so ref should have made him go off, no time to get a sub ready and Forest see out the game or even nick it!
 
Gordyola said:
City should come out and say they expect a safe passage for the coach and if one object is thrown they will return to CFA absolute zero tolerance
Click to expand...
Apparently there was over 600 objects recorded hitting our team bus that day…
 
Didn't see any of that game, but it doesn't surprise me in the least to have read what happened and how liverpool came about their winning goal.

Problem is nothing can, and nothing will be done about it. Supposedly best league in the world has total idiots in charge of games. To make a total blatant error like that is shocking at the very least - it shows a lack of knowledge of the rules on the referee's part, but all Forest will get is a paragraph from an ex-ref saying how bad the decision was

even the manager who had a right to complain now gets red carded, by the ref who made the error!

Absolute farce
 
ysmsa said:
Konate injury ffs.

He feigned a head injury so ref should have made him go off, no time to get a sub ready and Forest see out the game or even nick it!
Click to expand...
Dress it up however you want, it was a stoppage in play during injury time which would have lead to another minute.

Don't confuse that with the fact that this incident was a shambles, where the referee has dropped a massive bollock.

Alongside Gibbs white being booked for time wasting in the 93rd minute, the extra minute of injury time was valid.
 
chris85mcfc said:
Like I said, the Forest keeper was down for 4 minutes, and there were 5 lots of substitutions which I'm guessing they allow 30 seconds each for. Then you've just got your standard bits of stoppages in the game etc.

The extra minute in injury time was the Konate injury.

I genuinely can't think of a game where we should have had 8 or 9 minutes, but only got 3 or 4.
Click to expand...
No fate tempting! if we are leading by a single goal today at 90 mins you can guarantee at least 8 mins injury time.
 
give it to gordon said:
Just seen the clip for the dippers goal. So much wrong with that a top ref should not be making so many mistakes in such a short time.

First the dipper defender cheating claiming a head injury, clear cheating.

Secondly the dipper defender was clearly hit my his own keeper ! But not on the head.

Thirdly the ref stopped play with forest in possession.

Forth the ref than restarts the game by giving the ball to the dipper keeper who committed the 'foul' in the first place.

Then the ref is dishing out cards against forest at the end, when the ref has costed them a important point. Which come the end of the season could see forest relegated by a point.

What punishment will the ref get ?

Why doesnt VAR get involved in all these clear and obvious errors ?
Click to expand...
Because it was Twatwell on VAR the most incompetent **** ever to blow a whistle. Should never have reffed again after giving that phantom goal years ago
 
Gordyola said:
Madley was the cheating ref for Chelsea game then he reffed LFC and now he is back again so his last three appointments are City LFC City makes you wonder
Click to expand...

The thing is: people underestimate the demoralising effect a blatantly wrong decision can have on a team. They had been working and concentrating hard for nearly 100 minutes. They were in control of the ball, out of danger and had it taken away from them while they were all out of defensive shape. It's like the Rashford/ Fernandes goal at OT. We totally lost composure for 15 minutes, they scored again and we couldn't retrieve the situation. They are human, they know when they have been shafted. They aren't robots. Mistake or deliberate? You tell me.
 
Paul1970 said:
Just go along with it mate he is gone at the end of the season . Like I said it is 98 percent chance they win this title and I’ve accepted it and I’ve even got a big bet on them aswell but come next season that is when it starts again and without him and his style that team starts to break up and without the financial backing they will go back to challenging top 4 again .
Click to expand...
4 points above and a game in hand and they are 98% chance of winning the title no chance

1709462453341.png
 
"That decision at Spurs" is the new version of spending the "Coutinho money".

Every crap, dodgy decision they get in their favour now, they all point back at that (admittedly shocking) Spurs decision as evidence that they don't get all the decisions. Well I think that bad decision has been repaid multiple times now, but they'll keep coming out with it whenever they get one, just watch.

Just like how whenever they spent big for years, they all claimed it was spending the money from Coutinho. Some of them probably still think that about new signings now, the way they go on about it.
 
give it to gordon said:
Just seen the clip for the dippers goal. So much wrong with that a top ref should not be making so many mistakes in such a short time.

First the dipper defender cheating claiming a head injury, clear cheating.

Secondly the dipper defender was clearly hit my his own keeper ! But not on the head.

Thirdly the ref stopped play with forest in possession.

Forth the ref than restarts the game by giving the ball to the dipper keeper who committed the 'foul' in the first place.

Then the ref is dishing out cards against forest at the end, when the ref has costed them a important point. Which come the end of the season could see forest relegated by a point.

What punishment will the ref get ?

Why doesnt VAR get involved in all these clear and obvious errors ?
Click to expand...
It’s possible that Tierney was conned by Konate and genuinely believed he had a head injury. It’s possible he made a genuine mistake in giving the ball back to the dippers . But at that point with the Forest players complaining, the whole crowd booing, if you had made a mistake, you would have realised and thought lets not make this any worse - blow the whistle, game over , no damage done . But he didn’t did he. He let the cunts carry on beyond reason to score . Absolutely fucking rotten .
 
halfcenturyup said:
The thing is: people underestimate the demoralising effect a blatantly wrong decision can have on a team. They had been working and concentrating hard for nearly 100 minutes. They were in control of the ball, out of danger and had it taken away from them while they were all out of defensive shape. It's like the Rashford/ Fernandes goal at OT. We totally lost composure for 15 minutes, they scored again and we couldn't retrieve the situation. They are human, they know when they have been shafted. They aren't robots. Mistake or deliberate? You tell me.
Click to expand...
I agree , not that fussed that Liverpool won, I expected them to anyway, and even if them dropping points would have been great news for us the real injustice is for Forest. They lost what could be prove to be a very important point come the end of the season. If the boot would have been on the other foot the media would have been full of Klopp demanding a replay.
 
Really_here said:
I agree , not that fussed that Liverpool won, I expected them to anyway, and even if them dropping points would have been great news for us the real injustice is for Forest. They lost what could be prove to be a very important point come the end of the season. If the boot would have been on the other foot the media would have been full of Klopp demanding a replay.
Click to expand...
I thought the Match if the Day analysis was pretty good and fair, but they only ever said how Liverpool benefitted and how it was bad for Forest.

They never mentioned how bad the decision was for ourselves and Arsenal. I'm sure if we had something like that, they'd mention how aggrieved Liverpool would be about it.
 
They are making a documentary about Klopp leaving. They are filming it now. They will want them to win everything they can to make the Disney show success. Anything that can be given to them will be. I hope it falls flat on its face and they fail, but the powers that be seem to want a certain outcome and It seems like it will happen sadly.

I can see a City red card next week. However, I hope you destroy them.

By the way, where can I watch the programme about Pep and City doing an amazing treble last season? Or was that ignored again.
 
mattcity5 said:
I thought the Match if the Day analysis was pretty good and fair, but they only ever said how Liverpool benefitted and how it was bad for Forest.

They never mentioned how bad the decision was for ourselves and Arsenal. I'm sure if we had something like that, they'd mention how aggrieved Liverpool would be about it.
Click to expand...
Press would be going mental.
 
mattcity5 said:
I thought the Match if the Day analysis was pretty good and fair, but they only ever said how Liverpool benefitted and how it was bad for Forest.
Click to expand...
The one thing that pissed me off was Shearer describing it as a 'head injury.' I know he's big on the dementia in ex-footballers thing, so he doesn't want to cast doubt on players, but there are countless players that go down holding their head to get the game stopped, and it should be called out.

I'd love to see a study of the number of players going down holding their head before and after that rule changed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top