SiMCFC
Well-Known Member
Sorry if it has offended anyone, am I best deleting the post?
I would say not. It's a matter of public record.SiWatts90 said:Sorry if it has offended anyone, am I best deleting the post?
We did have a think about it but GDM is correct. Anyone can look at that document if they want to.gordondaviesmoustache said:I would say not. It's a matter of public record.SiWatts90 said:Sorry if it has offended anyone, am I best deleting the post?
MCFC-alan88 said:Read it, disturbing to say the least. I'd be highly surprised if he ever sees freedom. I'm sure he'll get a nice warm welcome from those inside.
Ducado said:MCFC-alan88 said:Read it, disturbing to say the least. I'd be highly surprised if he ever sees freedom. I'm sure he'll get a nice warm welcome from those inside.
It says he will serve 2/3 of his sentence before becoming eligible for parole which is just over 19 years, he was given 29 years not 35 as reported the 35 included 6 years on licence, I think he got off quite lightly all things considered he will be around 56 when he is eligible for parole still plenty of time for him to spend the money he has earnt and he will still be a sexual predator
tidyman said:Ducado said:MCFC-alan88 said:Read it, disturbing to say the least. I'd be highly surprised if he ever sees freedom. I'm sure he'll get a nice warm welcome from those inside.
It says he will serve 2/3 of his sentence before becoming eligible for parole which is just over 19 years, he was given 29 years not 35 as reported the 35 included 6 years on licence, I think he got off quite lightly all things considered he will be around 56 when he is eligible for parole still plenty of time for him to spend the money he has earnt and he will still be a sexual predator
The police seem quite keen to investigate other potential crimes he has almost certainly committed though.
Another couple of lumpy consecutive sentences on top of what he's got and that might well be enough to see him off. Or at least make him a very old man.