Stoned Rose said:
Cant be arsed reading through all of this thread but the Fail is reporting that he's having a medical at the rags today. Done deal at 30m.
Not sure I'm convinced but even if it does happen I find it a bizarre choice of signing. Rags are fully stocked with wingers and 'attacking midfielders' so dont actually need this kid. It also leaves them still without a 'general' in midfield and a proper left back. Unless they plan on spending further I still see them as weaker than us.
Further, 30m is a huge fee, especially for an unproven kid. Very un-fergie indeed.
On another note if they do sign him (or anyone) for 30m - isn't that 'out of order' these days? Surely 'buying success' is frowned upon (and 'unfair') these days? ;)
United had wingers when they signed Ronaldo. Some signings are done for the potential of greatness. If this guy reaches his peak, his posititon will be irrelevant. His influence will be all encompassing. This signing is not about position. It is about potential. You don't decide to not buy a potential best player in the world, simply because you currently have a glut in the perceived position he plays. Not to mention, Moura actual position is not set in stone. He plays wide now, but his potential suggests he can become a superstar. And that is not a position.
And furthermore, United is not stocked at attacking midfielders. They have Kagawa, Zidane Cleverly and that's it. Adding Moura to that mix, makes them dynamic. We have Nasri, Silva and Adam Johnson. Yet we tried to get Hazzard. Did you think we were overstacked then?