Cheadle_hulmeBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2012
- Messages
- 16,889
KLoveCity said:Cheadle_hulmeBlue said:If I was shaw I wouldn't move to us ur record on young players, especially English is terrible right now. I would move to either united or Liverpool where I would have a better chance of playing
I've noticed something... on one hand you complain about our lack of English players. Then when we're linked with one, you say he shouldn't come here. So what do you want exactly?
It's obvious that if Shaw did come here, it'd be at the expense of Clichy or Kolarov, so he'd play at least 30 games a season. Clichy and Kolarov have exactly 25 appearances each for City so far this season. Shaw has made 30 appearances for Southampton, just 5 more than our rotated left-backs, because his club play less games (earlier cup eliminations + no Europe).
tl;dr: Shaw would play lots of games here and probably become our #1 left-back before too long. It'd be a good move for him and for the club, because unlike too many of our English signings like Sinclair (who can't even get on West Brom's bench most weeks), he has a level of talent beyond most young English players.
Tbh I'm looking at it more from a national team point of view and for the player the self. Having seen us buy English players like Barry, Milner, lescott and seen them not played even when good enough especially Milner. I don't want to see them come here unless they are guaranteed a good number of games, not just the odd cup game or ten minutes at the end like Milner. I just thnk it would be a shame for someone lie say Barkley to come here and go from a regular starter to barely playing.
Shaw could start, but if I was him I'd rather move to somewhere like Liverpool where I know the manager has faith in young players, especially British players. One player I still can't believe we god rid of was trippier, he is ripping up the championship now. I would have move Richards to right back maybe and put him t rb