Berkovic_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Feb 2011
- Messages
- 1,266
de niro said:Berkovic_blue said:de niro said:
For claiming it wasn't awful?
Laughing out fucking loud at that!
There's no context anymore for some people. I know what an awful performance looks like, I've been watching City for over 20 years, that was not one.
Any game that you comprehensively dominate possession, produce 10 shots on target to their one and deservedly bag 3 points, cannot, by any logical mind be proclaimed to be an awful performance. Like I already said, hyperbole and exaggeration are off the charts again.
Now shove the specs up your arse (linked from the sun no less)
we were dire, the team selection was dire. ok not helped by reading timewasting etc or in fact a barmy ref but we have world beaters in our team and we were as flat as fuck.
we need fucking pace, not just in a player but in our mindset.
very lucky today.
Dire and lucky, hmmmm. I genuinely don't know where people get this negativity from. Please explain to me how we were lucky? We absolutely battered them in the first half, dropped a bit in the 2nd but the effort was still there and eventually got the goal we DESERVED.
Reading were lucky they only lost by 1. You saying we were lucky is basically saying we didn't deserve to win the game. Is that seriously what you think?
DIRE - where do you go from there when we actually play badly and lose a game? What are the levels below dire? I'm genuinely fascinated because to me it looks like a load of nonsense hyperbole and exaggeration.
PACE - when you're facing 9 defenders 30 yards from their own goal line pace is as much use as a chocolate fireguard. You need pace when there is space in behind the defence, of which there was none. Or when counter-attacking, and considering they barely had the ball in our half, the oppurtunities for that were extremely limited.