mexico1970
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Jun 2019
- Messages
- 32,906
- Team supported
- Manchester City
A majority verdict of 10-1 required. Which would suggest, at this moment, at least 2 jurors aren't feeling a guilty verdict.
Hmmmmmmmm
A majority verdict of 10-1 required. Which would suggest, at this moment, at least 2 jurors aren't feeling a guilty verdict.
Must admit it's a bit concerning that at this stage they can't get 10/11 jurors to agree a verdict on what is quite a simple case from an evidential viewpoint.goes any long him or her on holiday will join backin
Jury's giving its verdict now
What am i missing here ?So neither are found guilty of assaulting the male copper?
What am i missing here ?
How can they come to that decision ?
Sounds like it, the law is an ass, who in their right mind would want to be a copper nowadays when they can be assaulted on camera and no action is takenDoes this mean the other **** might have gotten away with it?
Sounds like it, the law is an ass, who in their right mind would want to be a copper nowadays when they can be assaulted on camera and no action is taken
Sorry mate, what i meant was 'how can you not find them guilty with the video we've all seen' ?![]()
Man guilty of Manchester Airport attack on police officers
Mohammed Amaaz was seen attacking two female officers in footage shared widely on social media.www.bbc.co.uk
Correct, Muhammed Amaad only had one charge against his name and no verdict reached. The other **** was found guilty on three charges but no verdict reached on the assault charge against the male copper. That is unbelievable and I will love to know the reasons. Hope the CPS go for a retrial though.Does this mean the other **** might have gotten away with it?
I would suspect because the officer didn't identify himself before grabbing AmaazWhat am i missing here ?
How can they come to that decision ?