Mancini Breaking News Part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
moomba said:
BillyShears said:
samharris said:
Well lets hope the next manager is a "yes sir,no sir,three bags full sir" kinda guy..

What you mean is a manager who respects the structure of the hierarchy at the club and more importantly respects the people in those positions rather than publicly bashing them whenever he doesn't get his own way.

Maybe Mancinis first line of reporting is Khaldoon, Txiki works alongside the manager and Ferran concentrates on the business side of things.

Maybe he reports directly to Khaldoun but Khaldoun thinks he's not a team player and doesn't respect the people he works with and therefore has chosen to sack him for the good of the club.
 
ayrshire_blue said:
Only my opinion, but here's the scenario I think is going on at the minute.

After the FA cup final, Mancini has been asked to leave the club at the end of the season.

He's been asked to do so in a similar fashion to Fergusons retirement, ie seeing out the last couple of games.

Mancini, being a naturally stubborn manager, has told the club he won't leave of his own accord, and has told the club to sack him if they want rid of him.

The club, aware Mancini is a fans favourite, are between a rock and a hard place. They want rid of Mancini, but don't want to piss the fans off by getting rid of him in Hughes fashion. They know the fans will want to say thanks and goodbye, that way they get rid of him and the fans aren't as pissed off.

What It's created is an absolute fuck up.


There is the little question of bye bye money, he's sacked it's pay day, he resigns??
 
tramazi said:
get a grip guys.... there are a lot of "We didnt win anything lets sack the manager" fans who imo are not thinking....

I'd love to know where all these fans are who are saying we haven't won anything so sack the manager. I've seen lots of people give various reasons for thinking it is the right time for a change but not many (if any) who have said it is solely because we haven't won anything.
 
ban-mcfc said:
@#!*% @#!*% , get those ***** away from the club now.

any fan going against the owners decision after all he's done is a twat.

they know what they're doing.

I disagree with you there, and I wanted Mancini terminated new years 2011/12 (as I made clear on here just a couple of time before AND after winning the title...but I wasn't going to bang on about it) as I thought I could see where this was going and was convinced the on-the pitch matters had more of the "despite him" than "because of him." I continue to think he is more of a hindrance than a help in that regard. Overall I believe he has done nothing remarkable given the finances and players placed at his disposal.

I understand that people disagree and for good reasons, and I understand their reasons.

Having said that, if a fan disagrees with Roberto going he shouldn't fear saying so and is not a twat for disagreeing with the Big Boss. He becomes a twat the moment he swerves into insulting Big Boss or doubting his commitment to City.
 
the goats backside said:
Can i ask a question. For all those that wanted Mancini out and Mourinho in, will you be happy with Pelligrini instead ?

I get the impression that as long as Bobs gone theyre not arsed!!
 
the goats backside said:
Can i ask a question. For all those that wanted Mancini out and Mourinho in, will you be happy with Pelligrini instead ?

I think most of those who've been clamouring for Mancini to go would be happy with Iain Dowie at this stage.
 
samharris said:
the goats backside said:
Can i ask a question. For all those that wanted Mancini out and Mourinho in, will you be happy with Pelligrini instead ?

I get the impression that as long as Bobs gone theyre not arsed!!

All this shit is certainly going to make Mancini feel like the elephant in the room at Reading.
 
BillyShears said:
samharris said:
Well lets hope the next manager is a "yes sir,no sir,three bags full sir" kinda guy..

What you mean is a manager who respects the structure of the hierarchy at the club and more importantly respects the people in those positions rather than publicly bashing them whenever he doesn't get his own way.


I'd rather a football man be left make the decisions on the playing squad and be backed.. yes backed by the business team there to support him. If they aren't doing their jobs to Bobby's satisfaction then fuck them off.
 
BillyShears said:
BobKowalski said:
Didsbury Dave said:
You've got it bang on mate.

There is nothing the club could do differently about this. It's just moral high grounding and blame gaming which diverts from the key fact.

The hierarchy have decided that Mancini isn't the man for the club. A brave and, I believe, correct decision.

Brave. Its bleeding heroic. I can see Ferran and Txiki hanging round outside Mancini's office nudging each other and whispering

"Go on you tell him?"
"Me boss? I'm not telling him its your idea"
"Hmm. Tell you what lets wait until after the cup final he'll be in better mood then hopefully. Now are you sure no one knows that we have Pellegrini lined up? No one saw you lunching with his agent last week?"
"Its cool boss. I used a disguise. No one suspects a thing."
"Excellent. Nothing can wrong. We win the cup. Tell Roberto he's out and then put out a short statement. All very professional. The Sheikh will be pleased. Come Txiki our work is done here. Lunch?"
"Great boss! Can I...?"
"Yes Txiki you can wear the disguise. A nuns outfit you say. Ingenious Txiki. Very ingenious."

Alternatively.

"You read this? Hahahahahahahaha. He says he doesn't work for us."

"What? Let me see that. Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha."

"You spoken to Pelli?"

"He's in."

"Great. What do we do with the Italian?"

"Who cares. He doesn't work for us remember. Leave it to Khaldoun."
Christ almighty, if that's the way it played out I wouldn't be surprised if those two wake up in the next few months to newspaper headlines of their unemployment as a surprise.

I'm not saying that it's happening either way those two scenarios lay out. You run a club like that though (either) and you end up a circus. Maybe you have a successful circus, but we keep getting told that the owner wants to avoid being a circus above all else.
 
massprotest_zpse9960486.jpeg


See what you've done!!!
 
Can't we have Stuart Hall as director of communications?
He's very eloquent. A gifted linguist to boot.
 
George Hannah said:
massprotest_zpse9960486.jpeg


See what you've done!!!

jesus h fucking christ.

if the owners see that.

stupid fucking morons, let the people in charge work their stuff, it's not the fans decision.
 
pominoz said:
Esteban de la Sexface said:
pominoz said:
I think you may have misread may post, i used the wrong word concerning your post, then said that
" some on here are getting hysterical.
I have read posts that the owner is a "soulless ****" and that posters are done with City if Mancini goes".
That did not include you.

You lumped me in with that "some on here". You were reacting to my posts and used that as a reference point in your argument. Please do not do that again.

I did try to be nice with my retraction of the use of "Bile" concerning you, nevermind.
The point is, we had the same meltdown with Sven's and Hughes sackings, it will all blow over and City will go marching on.
"Today's news and tomorrow's fish and chip's wrappings", calm down ;)

I'm calm lad. Not one for the keboard bashing and internet warrior bolloxology. This is my opinion and I'd put it to you the exact same way if I met you for a pint. Only with an Irish brogue and a twinkle in my eye. My charms are useless on internet forums
 
So if players like Kompany , silva , Kun turn round and ask for a transfer as they don't get on with bob

who goes bob or the players

which forces certain peoples hands
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top