cleavers
Moderator
Re: Mancini Breaking News Part 4
My understanding on Friday evening was that it was leaked to a few that put huge (5 figures was mentioned) bets on, resulting in the odds on him shortening to as little as 1/10 in a couple of hours (he was already favourite). This was then picked up by one newspaper here, then talksport, and eventually the media widely. However it was twitter that was heavily involved at the start.neoblue said:I was under the impression it had leaked from the Spanish media. Not a lot city could do about that.cleavers said:While much of what you've said is fine, this is where I don't understand it, because the word was all over the net by 8pm (ish) on Friday evening. This was well before it hit the media big time, now I don't know if City were aware of it, but they certainly should have been, because social media at City is supposedly taken very seriously, and it was from here that the news came about a couple of big punts on Pellegrini that had shortened his odds at a couple of bookies. I'm sure someone monitors social media, or had we taken our eye off the ball because it was the night before the cup final ? I'm sure it could have been better contained at this point, but hindsight is as always a wonderful thing.tolmie's hairdoo said:Firstly, the initial leak does not come out if City, they are playing catch-up in the team hotel on the morning of a Cup Final.