blutone3 said:
they're the last proper football team in the Premier League. We couldn't be prouder.
cor,bloody hell mate,look ive got nothing against stoke,im happy you lot are back in the top league,after a long absence,you are one of the old clubs who have a history within the game!.
but ffs you are NOT a proper football team at the mo,your style of play is crap!! (almost as crap as us at the mo!) hoofing the bloody ball up in the air and clogging opponents is not the way to go honestly! youve gotta admit these games with city have been a poor advert for the game havent they? cor can we pleeeeeease just have a decent game of footy tomorrow where we all can get a positive outcome from it??
good luck anyway an hope you lose!
Let me explain what I mean by proper football.
There is no such thing as 'the right way' to play the game in terms of style. An ineffective short passing game is as entertaining as an ineffective long ball game. Ultimately, the team fails to create chances and makes no real progress. There is no entertainment. An effective long ball team can create a lot of chances and score goals. This is much more entertaining than an ineffective short passing game. The game is about chance creation and it is this that makes it exciting. I don't know about you, but I don't put on a game of football on the TV so I can admire the teams that pass it around on the halfway line the best. Passing football is fine and dandy if you've got a midfield who are not only good at ball retention, but can get from box to box and pick out fantastic through balls every single game. Would we be able to create sufficient chances to stay up with the midfielders available to a team at our level? No, we wouldn't. West Ham have a 'cultured' midfield that play what is apparently tremendous football, and they're in a right old mess. Does having a player who can throw the ball 35 yards mean that we can create a chance every time we get into the opposition half? Yes it does, so why not? I can guarantee that if, say, SWP could launch a ball like that you'd have him taking throw-ins, because it's an opportunity for you to score and win the game. If you create chances and win, everyone goes home entertained. If you smack the ball long to nobody or play tippy-tappy on the halfway line, everyone is bored and dissatisfied.
There is, however, a spirit that the game was intended to be played in. People forget that we invented football in this country and that the Football League was founded by teams like Stoke, each advocating an honest, fair and physical game. Whilst not part of the Football League set-up, look at Corinthians, a team so sportsmanlike that they refused to score penalties, as they believed that the opposition could never intentionally foul them. Lately, however, some continental ideas have started to slip into our game. Spanish football is boring, because continental referees have turned their game into a non-contact sport where diving and cheating is encouraged. Now almost every team follows suit, from The Shit to Blackburn. Arsenal fans whine like little girls because the nasty Stoke thugs actually tackled their precious ickle starlets. That kind of attitude is sick, wrong and is cancerous. They believe that their team should be allowed to cheat, they truly believe that teams like Stoke should be banned. It's just plain wrong. So far as I can tell, Stoke are the only team in the division to reject this vile continental nonsense and to play the game in the spirit it was intended. Honest, hard-but-fair football.