A
A
Anonymous
Guest
OB1 said:However, the club might have been able to engineer a resignation if they had played hard ball on a new contract. I do think that him swanning off to Monaco would have been the best outcome for City.
Mancini by all accounts would've been happy to resign had City not given him a new contract, which from his side you can understand. He was going into the last 12 months of his contract, and he had a couple of big money offers which obviously aren't there this summer. Ball was in City's court.
I think you're right about the perception - due to the wave of euphoria at winning the league in the manner in which we did, to sack Mancini and then not have a candidate immediately lined up would've looked incredibly crass. My thing is that ultimately football is a pretty crass business and sometimes you have to take your medicine for the greater good. I remember Bob Kowalski laughing at me relentlessly for saying City had a long term plan which didn't fit with Mancini's profile and that his sacking was inevitable.
Water under the bridge now I guess ... I certainly don't think with Ferran and Txiki in charge we will ever end up a similar situation again. As a few people have said, I fully expect MP to work his magic until Pep is done at Bayern and then the Barcelona dream team which Roman so craved will be reunited at City.