Mancini out (Merged)

[sammyvine]

Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

We won't win anything with Mancini, he is the problem imo.

The thing is, I don't think the owners will sack him:(. Martin O'Neil would be better imo as I can see us winning cups as well as a top4 place. You h?ave to remember he nearly got Villa into the top 4, how much more us with better players and more money

If we get into the CL, I would hate to see how Mancini would set up especially in the away games. He was shit in the CL with Inter despite having the likes of Adriano and Ibrahimovic, which is why Moratti got rid of him.

He is such a shit manager, I don't know why the owners gave him the job.<br /><br />-- Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:34 pm --<br /><br />

Yep. He will be class. Get him in and quickly!

He speaks flawless English, has made immediate impacts at every club he's been at with positive results and attractive football, has great man management skills and players love him (probably learnt that aspect from Jose), has a better record at Porto than Mourinho did and he is only very young (33) but still has quite a lot of experience and could build a dynasty at City.

If I could choose anyone it would be him, he's a class act and I think would be perfect for City, plus more realistic than Jose, Hiddink etc.

He won't come though. He said he wants to stay at Porto, and win the league again to prove this season was no fluke.

I can see him going to La Liga or Serie A even if he does leave. Personally I think he would be a fantastic choice, and somebody I can see doing really well despite being only 33 (sounds like a FM game lol). He is attack minded, and just seems a breath of fresh air tbh,

I really hope Mancini goes. I didn't even want Hughes to go as much as I want Mancini to go in all honesty.

 

[forevermancity]

Who should City get to replace Mancini?

Yep. He will be class. Get him in and quickly!

He speaks flawless English, has made immediate impacts at every club he's been at with positive results and attractive football, has great man management skills and players love him (probably learnt that aspect from Jose), has a better record at Porto than Mourinho did and he is only very young (33) but still has quite a lot of experience and could build a dynasty at City.

If I could choose anyone it would be him, he's a class act and I think would be perfect for City, plus more realistic than Jose, Hiddink etc.

I'd prefer him to Jose any day of the week. No big ego either. If city are thinking long term this has got to be ou man!

 

[sammyvine]

Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

He speaks flawless English, has made immediate impacts at every club he's been at with positive results and attractive football, has great man management skills and players love him (probably learnt that aspect from Jose), has a better record at Porto than Mourinho did and he is only very young (33) but still has quite a lot of experience and could build a dynasty at City.

If I could choose anyone it would be him, he's a class act and I think would be perfect for City, plus more realistic than Jose, Hiddink etc.

I'd prefer him to Jose any day of the week. No big ego either. If city are thinking long term this has got to be ou man!

Unfortunately I think the owners will stick with Mancini.

I we get 4th, Mancini will be here next season:(

 

[GazM]

Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

Villa Boas. He'll know what to do with our attacking options. Shit on Balotelli, Dzeko, and Milner all you want, but at the end of the day Mancini is a center back, and organization and cohesion higher up the pitch is lacking. Villa Boas is the man for this job.

wtf ?!

 

[Santiago Street]

Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

I hope all you little pussies moaning and bitching about one defeat in a very tough away match with mitigating factors will start a new thread offering your wembley tickets to GENUINE city fans who don't throw the toys out of the pram every time we lose.

Owen Coyle
Ian Holloway
Boas for fucks sake
Guardiola lol

blah blah blah, flavour of the month bullshit

Get over your fuckin selves

 

[briand]

Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

Coyle has shown real telent for me. not a big enough name for some of you on here bu a manager that knows english football and it's culture and has improved both clubs he's been at. He plays attractive football, has an eye for a player and deals well the the media.
I'd wager the likes of Milner, Tevez and Johnson would see him as a breath of fresh air.

There'd be no more 5 minute conferences outisde the dressing room at half time that's for sure. He's be in communicating with his players as is normal.

Do we have to go for some foreign manager who you all rave about even though he doesn't have a clue about English football?

Good post and I totally agree. Mourinho is the obvious choice but if we can't get him then id like us to go for Coyle. For me he is going to be a top manager for years to come and he could build a legacy here as he has time on his side. I like his style of play and his, no bulshit interviews. Plus he is obviously a good motivator.
Won't be a popular choice I know but thats just me.

 

[TheMidnightClaret]

Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

Coyle has shown real telent for me. not a big enough name for some of you on here bu a manager that knows english football and it's culture and has improved both clubs he's been at. He plays attractive football, has an eye for a player and deals well the the media.
I'd wager the likes of Milner, Tevez and Johnson would see him as a breath of fresh air.

There'd be no more 5 minute conferences outisde the dressing room at half time that's for sure. He's be in communicating with his players as is normal.

Do we have to go for some foreign manager who you all rave about even though he doesn't have a clue about English football?

[/quote]

Not a big enough name to come in and work with high profile players. Also at both English clubs he has been at, his first 6 month or so has been rocky, before things started clicking. If Mancini is getting treated like this after a defeat at Anfield I don't think anyone would give Coyle the time. Also his record in the transfer market isn't great. He's good at getting the best out of players. I think Everton or Villa is around his level. He will never be a top manager.

i've said all along if Mourinho did make himself available then irregardless of how Mancini finishes the season we have to go for Mourinho. Mourinho has proved himself time and time again in all different leagues and numerous times in europe. Mancini has not!

 

[JoeCity21]

Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

It's frustrating how it's like "Mancini will still be here if we get fourth :-("

So what? He'd have fulfilled what is a very tough job. If we get fourth, Mancini can stay as long as we keep progressing.

We have improved generally since Mancini has come. Last year we finished fifth. This year we finish fourth, and next year with a full pre-season under our belts the players who haven't quite hit their best will improve, and we will become a title challenging team.

If we don't get CL football, which I think is unlikely atm, then yes, Mancini will most likely go, and rightly so as the main objective of his job has not been met.

 

[ST Coleridge]

Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

Coyle? Benitez? O'Neill? HOULLIER?

Seeing as half the fans on here fly into a psycho rage when we lose a game, I really don't these fellas are going to make you happy.

For what it's worth, I think Mancini should be given another year if we make fourth. If we don't, then I'd have -

Guardiola - Very unlikely to get him, but the best manager in the world for me.
Mourinho - Would be entertaining, and able to attract stars.
Van Gaal - His Ajax 95 and Bayern 2010 sides played wonderful football, and he's eminently gettable.
Klinsmann and/or Lowe - Now here's a 'dynasty' for you. Klinsmann organised a top-down reorganisation of the German national team, the fruits of which Lowe guided to a semi in last year's WC. Doubt many Bluemooners would have the patience for such a project, though ;)
Del Bosque - Why does no-one ever mention the current WC-holding boss? He's sixty, mind.

 

[forevermancity]

Who should City get to replace Mancini?

I hope all you little pussies moaning and bitching about one defeat in a very tough away match with mitigating factors will start a new thread offering your wembley tickets to GENUINE city fans who don't throw the toys out of the pram every time we lose.

Owen Coyle
Ian Holloway
Boas for fucks sake
Guardiola lol

blah blah blah, flavour of the month bullshit

Get over your fuckin selves

Poor lad, If you think boas is just a flavour of the month you really are clueless. Open your eyes abit and watch the game further than football focus and motd