Mancini out (Merged)

Re: Mancini out

BillyShears said:
Mancini is a charlatan. A fake. An overhyped moron with an overinflated ego who has been found out time and time and time again since he got here. He wouldn't get a fucking job managing Sunderland, let alone a club with serious ambitions in this league. It's been a nice break from Bluemoon for me and it will continue as long as that piece of shit manager is in charge of our beloved club...

Enjoy Wembley lads....my ticket has gone to someone who gives a shit. I don't.
Click to expand...

Close the door on the way out then you knob! Don't give a shit? What kind of blue are you?
I'm in China, set my alarm for 3am to watch a horrible performance; then read you're attention seeking fucking drivel!

I'm flying to UK on thursday and will be at Wembley, because I 'Give a shit' and have done for 45 years.

Next game lads.... Come on City!
 
Re: Mancini out

He will not allow players the freedom to try something on the pitch, ie Johnson on the right, I simply can not remember him on his natural left sided crossing style, with Dzeko in the middle as much as I dislike certain players I'm reluctant to judge them under this pedantic baboon, we scored 5 against the same team WBA scored 3 against away, as a fan for 45 years, I still care or else why the fuck am still on here, but feel it will be the same old same old next week and we wont make the top 4 under this moron Owen Coyle for me, no more foreign shite.
 
Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

If we can't get Mourinho it should be Villas Boas, end of discussion.
 
Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

won't pretend that I've even seen Portoguese football but I like the thought of Boas, not sure management would make such a radical hire however.
 
Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

dmbass said:
We clearly need someone who the players would want to play for, although I think that could be anyone else after this match. The usually proffesional Milner showing his frustration just confirms for me he has to go.

His tactics completely baffle me. I'd seriously take a reallistic Owen Coyle or Martin O'neill once Mancini gets the boot. The players need to be a team and need a manager they can respect, enjoy playing for and who would play them in a tactical set-up which makes sense.
Click to expand...
Perhaps it is Milner that needs to go. After doing fuk all, game long he throws a tantrum.
 
Re: Mancini out

I admit it concerns me when he does something mind boggling as playing Milner on the left and then risking Silva and De jong on a lost cause so late on. He really made himself look like an amateur coach tonight and has put heaps of pressure on himself with that performance.
 
Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

Villa Boas. He'll know what to do with our attacking options. Shit on Balotelli, Dzeko, and Milner all you want, but at the end of the day Mancini is a center back, and organization and cohesion higher up the pitch is lacking. Villa Boas is the man for this job.
 
Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

Mourinho would come if he was offered a long term deal that he can walk away from in the middle and get a huge pay off, plus a massive war-chest to bring in the players that suit him.

But gotta be in the CL and i think we need 3rd because we could balls up the qualifying game if we finished 4th tbh.

But please .... no more boring Italians.
 
Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

inGavious said:
But please .... no more boring Italians.
Click to expand...

I hate this. That's like saying no more English managers because Redknapp bankrupts every team he's ever managed.
 
Who should City get to replace Mancini?

For one we should not get rid off Mancini! It wouldn't matter who we replace him with certain fans won't give the manager enough time anyway
 
Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

It's funny how I started a thread recommending Martin O'Neill a few months ago and was laughed off the park. All those people demanding another foreign manager should remember that winning the Premier League and FA Cup should always be our main priority. A good run in the Chumps League (a la Spurs) is nice for the image but we have insufficient talent or experience to get beyond the Quarter Finals at least this decade, so why make such a bloody fuss about it?
 
Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

i,ve never been down like this for ages.can,t believe the fuck up mancini made last night.should sack him know
 
Who should City get to replace Mancini?

Why the fuck did he not play the same team that beat Sunderland
 
Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

iloveacougar said:
i,ve never been down like this for ages.can,t believe the fuck up mancini made last night.should sack him know
Click to expand...

I agree actually. I can't remember feeling so sad after a game. The result in it self doesn't bother me too much, but the performance was painful to watch. Too much is too much.
 
Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

Agree with the boring Italians but Harry would have to go some to bankrupt us

O neil would at least motivate the players and I could see us getting 4th and a cup under him (shame we cant have himfor a couple of months)
Mourinho is a must if we can attract him

Andouble said:
inGavious said:
But please .... no more boring Italians.
Click to expand...

I hate this. That's like saying no more English managers because Redknapp bankrupts every team he's ever managed.
Click to expand...
 
Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

The Fans lets have a vote on the players we play,buy and sell and formation
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top