Mancini out? (merged)

[NipHolmes]

I can't imagine the DoF role being a huge deterrent for managers (current and future). If it was, the club would effectively be shooting themselves in the foot on this front. Why isolate yourself from potential good candidates for the manager role?

Because it offers more stability. Managers come and go without th needs to overhaul teams so the new manager doesn't have to get in the players he wants.

A few players may come in but say with us we had Hughes and the Mancini and we've had to overhaul, we are basically limiting risk, financially its prudent.

 

[Goo]

I can't imagine the DoF role being a huge deterrent for managers (current and future). If it was, the club would effectively be shooting themselves in the foot on this front. Why isolate yourself from potential good candidates for the manager role?

The model is used at a large number of top European clubs including the best (Barca) so it will be no problem as long as we don't have managers who conflict with Txiki (if they do they won't last long).

That's what I mean. From what I'm reading it sounds like the additions of Txiki is hindering our chances of either keeping Bobby, or installing one of the best managers going at the moment. I just can't see it being that much of a problem. We have the best and most desirable job in English football right now, and probably top 5 in the world. Can't see many people saying "Oh you have a DoF? I'm out!"<br /><br />-- Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:19 pm --<br /><br />

I can't imagine the DoF role being a huge deterrent for managers (current and future). If it was, the club would effectively be shooting themselves in the foot on this front. Why isolate yourself from potential good candidates for the manager role?

Because it offers more stability. Managers come and go without th needs to overhaul teams so the new manager doesn't have to get in the players he wants.

A few players may come in but say with us we had Hughes and the Mancini and we've had to overhaul, we are basically limiting risk, financially its prudent.

Yeah, I'm not against the idea at all. I think bringing in Txiki and Ferran is perfect for taking our club forward.

 

[Anonymous]

Thats why he wont come here billy

It's also why in my opinion Mancini won't be at City for much longer either.

Well as skas has just said who would come as a top manager and work under the spanish pair
They call the shots not the manager
Because thats the way its looking at how our owners want to run the club.

That's why I suspect those people who think Mancini will only be dispensed with when an obvious candidate is available are a little wide of the mark. Looks like we want a first team coach rather than a manager. There are very few top drawer managers who'd work under those circumstances. Klopp would because it's a similar structure at Dortmund, Guardiola would but he's gone ... the likes of Moyes, Laudrup, etc. would simply because of the enormous opportunity it would represent managing City.

It might well be that for the long term good of the club Txiki/Ferran are prepared to bring in someone without an obvious management pedigree, because they bring other qualities to the job which are just as important.

 

[JoeMercer'sWay]

It's also why in my opinion Mancini won't be at City for much longer either.

Well as skas has just said who would come as a top manager and work under the spanish pair
They call the shots not the manager
Because thats the way its looking at how our owners want to run the club.

That's why I suspect those people who think Mancini will only be dispensed with when an obvious candidate is available are a little wide of the mark. Looks like we want a first team coach rather than a manager. There are very few top drawer managers who'd work under those circumstances. Klopp would because it's a similar structure at Dortmund, Guardiola would but he's gone ... the likes of Moyes, Laudrup, etc. would simply because of the enormous opportunity it would represent managing City.

It might well be that for the long term good of the club Txiki/Ferran are prepared to bring in someone without an obvious management pedigree, because they bring other qualities to the job which are just as important.

I don't see why just because they appointed from within at Barca why this has to be the setup?

At the end of the day Guardiola still got to spend an awful lot of money, as did Rijkaard before him and so on.

Therefore it's not unreasonable to conclude that if Soriano and Glick do their jobs properly and raise the club's revenues through the roof then Txiki will be able to do his job properly of buying the best available players for what we want to achieve without having to worry much about FFPR and therefore the manager(within reason) gets who he wants.

Therefore I don't see the reason why there needs to be conflict unless somebody doesn't do their job properly, which I'd have hoped we'd have got rid off when we finally realised Marwood was not transfer negotiating material.

 

[fablue]

Why would he leave?

He iz the best manager in England!

 

[baildon blue]

Yeah the best manager to fail in europe for the last 3 years.But europe isnt my biggest issue with Mancini its the fact he needs more money to spend and he isnt improving are current players.

 

[SPIDERBOY]

It's also why in my opinion Mancini won't be at City for much longer either.

Well as skas has just said who would come as a top manager and work under the spanish pair
They call the shots not the manager
Because thats the way its looking at how our owners want to run the club.

That's why I suspect those people who think Mancini will only be dispensed with when an obvious candidate is available are a little wide of the mark. Looks like we want a first team coach rather than a manager. There are very few top drawer managers who'd work under those circumstances. Klopp would because it's a similar structure at Dortmund, Guardiola would but he's gone ... the likes of Moyes, Laudrup, etc. would simply because of the enormous opportunity it would represent managing City.

It might well be that for the long term good of the club Txiki/Ferran are prepared to bring in someone without an obvious management pedigree, because they bring other qualities to the job which are just as important.

It's going to be laudrup,IMO....him and txiki were really close when they played for barcalona ,apparently..

 

[Didsbury Dave]

Why would he leave?

He iz the best manager in England!

He's such a fucking clown. What headlines did he expect? I heard this interview and straight away thought he'd get lampooned. He's lucky the tabloids seem to have overlooked it. He honestly doesn't seem aware of the consequences of his actions sometimes. I actually don't think he's very bright if I'm honest.

 

[SWP's back]

Why would he leave?

He iz the best manager in England!

He's such a fucking clown. What headlines did he expect? I heard this interview and straight away thought he'd get lampooned. He's lucky the tabloids seem to have overlooked it. He honestly doesn't seem aware of the consequences of his actions sometimes. I actually don't think he's very bright if I'm honest.

Hypocrite

So what if he gets lampooned. I didn't think you were the thin skinned sort Dave.

 

[Marvin]

Is Mancini not even allowed to defend himself from his critics?