the blue panther
Well-Known Member
Marvin said:Sounds like you're making an observation rather than asking a questionBillyShears said:Genuine question I've been meaning to ask those who think Mancini will be around for years to come and that he retains the owners full confidence based on his 5 year contract. This is what Mancini said after winning the FA Cup two years ago.
"I agree with Alex Ferguson, who says a manager needs total control," said Mancini. "But he has been at United for a long time so for him it is easy. He has to be in control of everything, doesn't he?
"Maybe for me it is difficult because I have only been here for 18 months or so. Maybe I need to have more control of the team and the other situations. For a manager that's very important. Maybe if I win the Premier League this season it will be different."
Mancini won the league and hasn't be granted anything like the power he wanted. If anything his power has been reduced significantly with the arrival of Txiki and Ferran.
Had Alex ferguson been appointed now, he'd almost certainly be operating under a Football Director.
The difference between the two clubs is not a judgement on how Mancini is regarded by his bosses vis a vis Ferguson, it's a historical consequence of Ferguson's reign at Old Trafford which is highly unlikely to be ever repeated again.
Fergies role and power have evolved over a 28 year period. That is the point Mancini was alluding to, probably in his broken English.
You could turn much of this inane argument on its head and ask why on Earth have United stuck with such a failure as Ferguson for all these years, when he's only managed to win the Chumps league twice, once with late , late goals against the run of play against Bayern Munich, and secondly, against Chelsea on feckin' penalties. And all that with the most expensively assembled squad ever in British football. Loser!