You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Mancini over Hughes?
- Thread starter allyboy
- Start date
BlueDejong
Well-Known Member
allyboy said:The left back situation..
Bobby signs Kolarov
Hughes signed Bridge.
That is all.
Bobby signs Balotelli
Hughes signed RSC
Bobby signs Boateng
Hughes signed Lescott
That is all
But Hughes nice signed Barry, Dejong, Tevez
Scottyboi
Well-Known Member
allyboy said:The left back situation..
Bobby signs Kolarov
Hughes signed Bridge.
That is all.
What sort of argument is that, we were in the early phase of our development and I doubt Kolarov even knew who we were untill last season. The spine of the team are Hughes recruits we should be grateful. Except for Santa
Bill Walker
Well-Known Member
like being back at school this :)
DannyBoy2890
Well-Known Member
BlueDejong said:But Hughes nice signed Barry, Dejong, Tevez
and signed kompany and zabba.
Im failing to understand the point of this thread though?
Tricky Dickys Right Foot Shot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2008
- Messages
- 10,553
Read an interesting fact in the M.E.N today saying that a total net spen by Hughes in 2 transfer windows was £220M whilst our Bobbys is £101M.
This is an unfair argument towards Hughes, cuz Hughes had to rebuild a team while Mancio used a spine Hughes bought, thus Mancio need not spend as much, cuz like the old saying goes, "Don't fix what is not damaged."C1TY4LIFE said:Read an interesting fact in the M.E.N today saying that a total net spen by Hughes in 2 transfer windows was £220M whilst our Bobbys is £101M.
Cheers.
Bill
Moderator
Scottyboi said:allyboy said:The left back situation..
Bobby signs Kolarov
Hughes signed Bridge.
That is all.
What sort of argument is that, we were in the early phase of our development and I doubt Kolarov even knew who we were untill last season. The spine of the team are Hughes recruits we should be grateful. Except for Santa
This.
Some pathetic threads started in here at times.
I see, Hughes had to rebuild the team from 9th to 10th.SkyBlueCitizen said:This is an unfair argument towards Hughes, cuz Hughes had to rebuild a team while Mancio used a spine Hughes bought, thus Mancio need not spend as much, cuz like the old saying goes, "Don't fix what is not damaged."C1TY4LIFE said:Read an interesting fact in the M.E.N today saying that a total net spen by Hughes in 2 transfer windows was £220M whilst our Bobbys is £101M.
Cheers.
Bill
Moderator
bluethai said:I see, Hughes had to rebuild the team from 9th to 10th.SkyBlueCitizen said:This is an unfair argument towards Hughes, cuz Hughes had to rebuild a team while Mancio used a spine Hughes bought, thus Mancio need not spend as much, cuz like the old saying goes, "Don't fix what is not damaged."
Cheers.
More drivel.
Peoples obsession with Hughes knocking is an embarrassment.