Prestwich_Blue said:
All this nonsense about not getting transfer targets. Like some spoiled, rich, fat kids stamping their feet because Mummy & Daddy won't buy them a better version of something they bought them last week.
For one thing, who knows what our targets were. Players we wanted might not have been for sale, might not have wanted to come to us or, if they did, we couldn't agree terms.
I also happen to know a leading club's chief exec and an agent so I know how complex some negotiations are. Agents & players play clubs off against each other for one thing. Dealing with agents is also tricky. It's a murky world and negotiations can seem to be straightforward then mysterious parties appear out of the woodwork demanding a cut and City will not play that game.
Clubs will also play hardball, refusing to deal until they've got their own targets lined up and have to go through the same loops.
It's not like going into Selfridges, picking a shirt you like then paying at the till. City have a way of doing business, which the owners have laid down. If Mancini or any of you don't like it then too bad.
By no means do I have a lot of sympathy for Mancini on this, but I think that post is a little naive. We're talking about a man who's spent 90% of his career in Italy, and managed Inter. I think he knows that these deals aren't straightforward. That does
not mean that the club's executives have performed adequately or sensibly,or supported him adequately, though.
Indeed, many of the current problems in the squad spring from Cook and Marwood's pathetic inability to negotiate sensible salaries. The reports of Nasri's reported salary suggest that they still can't negotiate a sensible contract. Pathetic. Marwood in particular is someone I am deeply suspicious of.