Mancini write-up by Didsbury Dave

Read it.Same old,same old Dave.
As David Byrne says on Psycho Killer,
"say something once(or in Didsbury's case ad nauseum),why say it again?".
 
Pam said:
samharris said:
blueinsa said:
Jeez you're easily pleased fella.

One thing to be said about Dave is yes, such was his conviction in his opinion of Bob, he would have wrote it.He enjoyed that day as much as any of us and to suggest otherwise is frankly fucking ridiculous and smacks of someone who can only attack the poster rather than his argument.


so why didnt he ?? but we all know that....Its all about timing..bad timing back then, perfect timing today,24 hrs after Bob get sacked..This was done for the reaction its getting..some react to the blog some react to the writer...Dave knows the score...

The same blog wouldnt get a sideways glance if it were done in say..3 months time..

The hurt is still very strong amongst the majority on here who wanted Bob to stay....The Blog was aimed at us..the hearts on our sleeves posse..

DD isn't happy unless he's being unpleasant to fellow blues, Sam. Sheer nastiness informs everything he says. The timing for him was exquisite.

Spot on Pam
 
I imagine he'll be sat reading all the feedback doing a lot of "PMSL, Brahahahahahaing" before coming on to enjoy his self importance. What he's basically done is taken 3 years of negative posts and managed to condense it into a one sided "I told you so I know better" blog.
I know one thing for sure, if I was ever in the trenches I'd rather have Mancini in my corner than "look at me Dave"
 
bluealf said:
Self serving drivel, but did anybody expect anything else ?

I backed Hughes and I backed Mancini and no doubt I will back whoever gets the job, because I don't want to hate anybody at the club I support and then have to hope City lose at some point so I can say I told you so to some strangers on the internet.
Spot on
 
I think he is entitled to a bit of gloating after the shit he took for years. Partly because many of the flaws Dave saw in Mancini were the ones that got him sacked.

Whoever ends up disagreeing with Pellegrini, I hope they aren't treated the same way.
 
rastus said:
A bitter chap who was disgruntled by the Hughes sacking and from day 1 preached negativity against Mancini. Odd
This sums it up for me
You have to ask did dismal write anything like this about that useless c unt Hughes when he was sacked?
 
Don't know what DD actually wants.
He must just get off on being miserable.

How long until we get 'this Pellegrini bloke is useless'

jog on
 
Blue Haze said:
I think he is entitled to a bit of gloating after the shit he took for years. Partly because many of the flaws Dave saw in Mancini were the ones that got him sacked.

Whoever ends up disagreeing with Pellegrini, I hope they aren't treated the same way.
You don't half come out with some offensive crap
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.