Mancini write-up by Didsbury Dave

samharris said:
so why didnt he ??
He was too busy writing about how horrible forum members are (or is it were now that he feels vindicated?) and how poor the City fanbase is in general for some reason or another. He was pretty upset at being constantly called out over what he had said during the season. Said a lot that amounted to how Blues shouldn't treat other Blues poorly for holding an opinion and how you'd never catch him treating Blues poorly for disagreeing with him.
 
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
blueinsa said:
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
Why labour the point though pal?? Jesus he has gone,inners not happy outers happy. We get on with it as a club as supporters together. I haven't seen an article by one inner saying why we should have kept Mancini so why should there be an article justifying his departure?
We should all just move on but for Dave to try to sort of say "I told you so" then I just really don't get it.

Dave is a big lad and can look after himself.

I just answered a post claiming he wouldn't have written such a piece after we won the league, when we have all known his stance on Bob and that even then, despite being as happy as any other blue, he felt the exact same way about Bob as he does to this day.

He never rated the guy.

But he says chinese whispers etc. He may never have rated the guy (fuck me,I'd love to know Daves views on every manager we have had since Mercer) but why feel the need to literally write a piece stabbing him in the back.
I will be eternally grateful to Mancini and for the success he brought to us domestically which we all craved for 35yrs.
To write a piece like that is unjustified IMO but that is all it is-my opinion.

No problems with anything you have just written mate, other than your opinion as to why Dave has written the article.

Now im definitely out, trying to watch Chelsea here ;-)
 
blueinsa said:
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
blueinsa said:
Jeez you're easily pleased fella.

One thing to be said about Dave is yes, such was his conviction in his opinion of Bob, he would have wrote it.

He enjoyed that day as much as any of us and to suggest otherwise is frankly fucking ridiculous and smacks of someone who can only attack the poster rather than his argument.

Why labour the point though pal?? Jesus he has gone,inners not happy outers happy. We get on with it as a club as supporters together. I haven't seen an article by one inner saying why we should have kept Mancini so why should there be an article justifying his departure?
We should all just move on but for Dave to try to sort of say "I told you so" then I just really don't get it.

Dave is a big lad and can look after himself.

I just answered a post claiming he wouldn't have written such a piece after we won the league, when we have all known his stance on Bob and that even then, despite being as happy as any other blue, he felt the exact same way about Bob as he does to this day.

He never rated the guy.

So let's all dance to Didsbury Dick's tune- absolute rubbish. He delivers more shite than a sewage farm.
 
If some well known knobhead journalist wrote this for The Sun or Daily Mail nobody would be saying "ohhh it's really well written".

If a journalist wrote this a few weeks ago we would be foaming at the mouth.

I found it one sided and hard to read because of the unbalance.

Weird.
 
rastus said:
A bitter chap who was disgruntled by the Hughes sacking and from day 1 preached negativity against Mancini. Odd

I disagree. If City had appointed someone he liked then he'd never have said what he said. For me, Dave just speaks his mind and gives his opinion. He does well to get so many people talking.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.