Mancini write-up by Didsbury Dave

[Bill]

I would disagree with every word.

 

[Selbyblue]

Im struggling to see why people have an issue with any of it. Surely his opinion is as valid as those who didnt want Bob to go.

What if its all true?

What if the moon's made of cheese ?

You would be entitled to that opinion but I wouldn't agree with you.

 

[Davs 19]

You mean he was right and you weren't?

Some outers just can't stop point scoring If you say the same thing often enough you will eventually be right a la the broken clock.

Very 'my dad's bigger than your dad" Exeter. Why don't we all just get behind the team we love and move forward ?

That's the second time you've accused me of repeated crowing (the last time was mentioning StHB's phone call to that twat Irani), and it's the second time you've been wrong. This is the first time since Mancini's sacking that I've even mentioned "inners" or "outers", precisely because I knew that some knobhead would jump all over it and accuse me of triumphalism, if I did. QED. As per the Irani thing, if you're gonna throw accusations around, then be sure you're right please.

And I'm right behind my team thanks, just as I have been for the better part of half a century

And I have a 50% success rate. You may also want to refresh yourself with the coc. Your post is typical of the ant mancini brigade . Very good at insulting/questioning fellow Blues that don't share your opinion , yet when the challenge is returned, you resort to personal insults.

Very classy.

 

[Trevor morleys tash]

All managers eventually get sacked. Criticising someone for years doesn't mean you're some kind of football nostradamus when he finally gets sacked.
I could quite easily say pellegrini is shit and say "I told you so" when he's eventually sacked (which he will be eventually).
But me criticising him for the next two years before he is sacked doesn't actually mean he hasnt done an an excellent job in the meantime.
The blog talks about rumours and haircuts and criticises for his performance when we beat united at wembley in a match that I feel transformed the club.
It's these silly comments that undermine the article because there are certain things I agree with re formation etc. But when you see him being criticised for his haircut, armani jacket and (understandably) not wanting to get soaked with champagne, you realise this isnt a balanced article.
It has been written by someone with a clear agenda which leaves all other comments in the article fairly redundant.
I'm glad I've read it though because it is quite enlightening in terms of the way mancini has been perceived and judged by some people. You realise that some of what they is is correct but it's unfortunately clouded by the desire to always look for the negatives in his management rather than the positives.

well said

 

[spacecadet]

And the drums keep rolling - C'mon el gobbo make an appearance.

 

[Davs 19]

Im struggling to see why people have an issue with any of it. Surely his opinion is as valid as those who didnt want Bob to go.

What if its all true?

What if the moon's made of cheese ?

You would be entitled to that opinion but I wouldn't agree with you.

I always knew you were wise :)

 

[m7mcfc]

He will be sat over his PC in triumph, as he get's 100+ posts on what was a load of shite to begin with. As I said before, attention seeker nothing more.

 

[blueinsa]

Some outers just can't stop point scoring If you say the same thing often enough you will eventually be right a la the broken clock.

Very 'my dad's bigger than your dad" Exeter. Why don't we all just get behind the team we love and move forward ?

That's the second time you've accused me of repeated crowing (the last time was mentioning StHB's phone call to that twat Irani), and it's the second time you've been wrong. This is the first time since Mancini's sacking that I've even mentioned "inners" or "outers", precisely because I knew that some knobhead would jump all over it and accuse me of triumphalism, if I did. QED. As per the Irani thing, if you're gonna throw accusations around, then be sure you're right please.

And I'm right behind my team thanks, just as I have been for the better part of half a century

And I have a 50% success rate. You may also want to refresh yourself with the coc. Your post is typical of the ant mancini brigade . Very good at insulting/questioning fellow Blues that don't share your opinion , yet when the challenge is returned, you resort to personal insults.

Very classy.

Is that the very same C of C that allows you to call a poster childish names or a rag or a twat or a **** or to fuck off etc etc etc just because he doesn't share your opinion of the manager?

Little bit late and a little bit silly to be trying to hide behind that set of rules given the amount of abuse you guys feel necessary to dish out to him don't you think?

Very classy indeed fella.

 

[Josh Blue]

fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap FAP

 

[mackenzie]

The very word 'blog' smacks to me of someone up their own arse anyway, and always has.