Mancini write-up by Didsbury Dave

[1961_vintage]

Can't be arsed reading all 22 pages so apols if already said (highly likely), but describing the article as "brilliant" raised my expectation levels, levels which were never achieved.

All felt just a little bit vindictive for my liking.

 

[Exeter Blue I am here]

Some outers just can't stop point scoring If you say the same thing often enough you will eventually be right a la the broken clock.

Very 'my dad's bigger than your dad" Exeter. Why don't we all just get behind the team we love and move forward ?

That's the second time you've accused me of repeated crowing (the last time was mentioning StHB's phone call to that twat Irani), and it's the second time you've been wrong. This is the first time since Mancini's sacking that I've even mentioned "inners" or "outers", precisely because I knew that some knobhead would jump all over it and accuse me of triumphalism, if I did. QED. As per the Irani thing, if you're gonna throw accusations around, then be sure you're right please.

And I'm right behind my team thanks, just as I have been for the better part of half a century

And I have a 50% success rate. You may also want to refresh yourself with the coc. Your post is typical of the ant mancini brigade . Very good at insulting/questioning fellow Blues that don't share your opinion , yet when the challenge is returned, you resort to personal insults.

Very classy.

Seriously, what are you talking about?!! I point out that DD received a lot of stick for his views on Mancini (and if you can find an insult in there, please let me know), you intervene and not for the first time accuse me of having said something earlier when I hadn't, and now you're telling me I insult people that disagree with me, resort to personal insults if they challenge me in return, and I need to consult the Code of Conduct. Baffling.

 

[oakiecokie]

I imagine he'll be sat reading all the feedback doing a lot of "PMSL, Brahahahahahaing" before coming on to enjoy his self importance. What he's basically done is taken 3 years of negative posts and managed to condense it into a one sided "I told you so I know better" blog.
I know one thing for sure, if I was ever in the trenches I'd rather have Mancini in my corner than "look at me Dave"

Sooner have fucking Baldrick.

 

[Sigh]

 

[Phil1]

I imagine he'll be sat reading all the feedback doing a lot of "PMSL, Brahahahahahaing" before coming on to enjoy his self importance. What he's basically done is taken 3 years of negative posts and managed to condense it into a one sided "I told you so I know better" blog.
I know one thing for sure, if I was ever in the trenches I'd rather have Mancini in my corner than "look at me Dave"

Sooner have fucking Baldrick.

Well hes's definitely been referred to as something that sounds like cunning plan..

 

[jauganaut]

I am afraid the author tried and failed haplessly to convince us that he is neutral or at least objective.
It is appparent from the start of the article that this writer was not arguing for or against Mancini but rather criticizing him.
His criticisms were largely unsubstantiated and the hilarious part is that he actually admitted it in the piece.
I think he would have come across as more lucid if he had just said;
I DIDNT LIKE MANCINI.
ALSO, I AM IN THE MINORITY .

 

[Davs 19]

That's the second time you've accused me of repeated crowing (the last time was mentioning StHB's phone call to that twat Irani), and it's the second time you've been wrong. This is the first time since Mancini's sacking that I've even mentioned "inners" or "outers", precisely because I knew that some knobhead would jump all over it and accuse me of triumphalism, if I did. QED. As per the Irani thing, if you're gonna throw accusations around, then be sure you're right please.

And I'm right behind my team thanks, just as I have been for the better part of half a century

And I have a 50% success rate. You may also want to refresh yourself with the coc. Your post is typical of the ant mancini brigade . Very good at insulting/questioning fellow Blues that don't share your opinion , yet when the challenge is returned, you resort to personal insults.

Very classy.

Is that the very same C of C that allows you to call a poster childish names or a rag or a twat or a **** or to fuck off etc etc etc just because he doesn't share your opinion of the manager?

Little bit late and a little bit silly to be trying to hide behind that set of rules given the amount of abuse you guys feel necessary to dish out to him don't you think?

Very classy indeed fella.

Never called an individual poster any of the above on the main forum my friend. Been personally insulted by several outers on here though, DD & BS in particular ( shame as I think BS brings a lot to the board). Check your facts and don't stereotype me(who are 'you guys ?)

Just thought I'd mention the coc as at least one 'outer" reports at the drop of a hat. Never felt the need myself as I'd need to value the opinion of the poster doing the insulting and that's not happened to date.

TBF, this is like trying to outwit a goldfish.

Stay classy "fella"

 

[Lavinda Past]

I think this thread is destined for the classics.

The article is Dismal's idea of footie porn, proving to the world that he is no more ITK than any other keyboard warrior tosspot. Of course, BS and Dismal's other disciples of doom will regard this as hot wanking material.

I read it all... but didn't even get a semi. The article needed a few sexy gifs or perhaps some 'celebrity knicker showing' snaps, or maybe a 'barm v muffin' debate.

I'm lying... I didn't read it all because there were no pictures. I wanted to write Dismal, you're a **** after the first paragraph.

But I lost interest, fell asleep for a bit, and dreamed about eating pike with Natalie Pike on Hartshead Pike.

As you do, like.

Dismal... You're still a ****

 

[Balti]

well that's the worst Mancini article so far

but that's hardly a surprise given the author and his long standing agenda

 

[blueinsa]

And I have a 50% success rate. You may also want to refresh yourself with the coc. Your post is typical of the ant mancini brigade . Very good at insulting/questioning fellow Blues that don't share your opinion , yet when the challenge is returned, you resort to personal insults.

Very classy.

Is that the very same C of C that allows you to call a poster childish names or a rag or a twat or a **** or to fuck off etc etc etc just because he doesn't share your opinion of the manager?

Little bit late and a little bit silly to be trying to hide behind that set of rules given the amount of abuse you guys feel necessary to dish out to him don't you think?

Very classy indeed fella.

Never called an individual poster any of the above on the main forum my friend. Been personally insulted by several outers on here though, DD & BS in particular ( shame as I think BS brings a lot to the board). Check your facts and don't stereotype me(who are 'you guys ?)

Just thought I'd mention the coc as at least one 'outer" reports at the drop of a hat. Never felt the need myself as I'd need to value the opinion of the poster doing the insulting and that's not happened to date.

TBF, this is like trying to outwit a goldfish.

Stay classy "fella"

I will give you a 2 out of 10 for trying to be clever in using a put down.

Must try much, much harder fella.