Mancini

[SPIDERBOY]

One or two signings have not been a great success but poor is a bit OTT

IMO I think he has been poor in the transfer window. I am not saying that the players he has bought are crap but I just cant justify spending 20+ million on players then playing them out of position or not to their strengths.

Why do you have to justify what he spends and who is he playing out of position, and not to their strengths

No disrespect mate,but your crazy... ;-)

 

[grim up north]

IMO I think he has been poor in the transfer window. I am not saying that the players he has bought are crap but I just cant justify spending 20+ million on players then playing them out of position or not to their strengths.

Why do you have to justify what he spends and who is he playing out of position, and not to their strengths

No disrespect mate,but your crazy... ;-)

Do enlighten me

 

[Andouble]

So if there is a change,who would be your choice....your opinion?

My top choices, assuming Mancini is gone and Mourinho isn't an option or goes to Chelsea (which I think he will)

1. Pellegrini, for reasons stated a few posts above
2. Ancelotti, he's not perfect but I think he got a bad rap and an unfair (though unsurprising) sack at Chelsea. Doesn't sound like he has a long-term future at PSG.

My wildcard would be Laudrup but I think from Swansea to a team shooting for a quadruple every year is too steep an immediate jump. I think he has potential to be one of the world's best managers in a few years time, though.

 

[jackrussel]

mancini is so bad you wonder how hes won 3 italian titles and the premiership and been in a semi-final every year since 2003,approx.we are much better getting rid and bringing someone new,my arse

 

[OB1]

if we can finish top 3 every year thats great and the odd cup final would be nice .

Truly incredible stuff.

If you think that the sheikh has spent all that money, and assembled this squad, with that as the objective then you are mind bogglingly deluded.

PMSL

 

[SPIDERBOY]

Why do you have to justify what he spends and who is he playing out of position, and not to their strengths

No disrespect mate,but your crazy... ;-)

Do enlighten me

What is the point of buying a player(whatever the amount)and playing him out of position and not to his strengths?......not a dig, a question.

 

[Andouble]

I don't think just finishing trophyless is a definitive reason for a manager to be sacked (it shouldn't be 8+ years like Wenger though, either). It's more about the lack of fight we've put up and our play has been below par for large stretches of the season.

If we finished 2nd by say 2 or 3 points and no FA Cup and scored 20+ more goals than we've had I'd probably be ok with Mancini staying, but we've clearly stagnated.

 

[kaz7]

No disrespect mate,but your crazy... ;-)

Do enlighten me

What is the point of buying a player(whatever the amount)and playing him out of position and not to his strengths?......not a dig, a question.

he must see something in training to justify where he plays them

 

[SPIDERBOY]

So if there is a change,who would be your choice....your opinion?

My top choices, assuming Mancini is gone and Mourinho isn't an option or goes to Chelsea (which I think he will)

1. Pellegrini, for reasons stated a few posts above
2. Ancelotti, he's not perfect but I think he got a bad rap and an unfair (though unsurprising) sack at Chelsea. Doesn't sound like he has a long-term future at PSG.

My wildcard would be Laudrup but I think from Swansea to a team shooting for a quadruple every year is too steep an immediate jump. I think he has potential to be one of the world's best managers in a few years time, though.

IMO,laudrup would be after mourinho

 

[daztrueblue91]

Do enlighten me

What is the point of buying a player(whatever the amount)and playing him out of position and not to his strengths?......not a dig, a question.

he must see something in training to justify where he plays them

Nasri's performances for us say otherwise as did Mario's.