Marc Cucurella

Status
Not open for further replies.
Charliegull said:
Brighton were not saying £30m. They have said all along £50m. Please shiw me where you got the £30m from.
Click to expand...
don't care what brighton value him. your greedy club can try whatever they can to distort and destroy the market with unfair and ridiculous valuations. city is a a properly run business and we do not plan to be like brighton we have a sustainable long term model. everything works on our valuation and nothing else.
 
Pollocksheader said:
Why do we have to make do with all these makeshifts though? It’s like when people say stones can play right back. Technically he can as he’s a right footed professional defender. Doesnt mean he does it well or doesn’t disrupt our attacking flow. Full backs are key in this side, it’s why that second summer we went balls deep on upgrading them which is why I find it so odd we’ve just happily ignored the left back position and happily just throw anyone with a left foot there.
Click to expand...
Bang on the money there, can Stones Laporte and Ake cover fullback? Yes they have done it but hand on heart has anyone thought fuck me how good was that they should play there more often. Not heard that once myself. Would they even be happy doing it? Probably not. I thought we needed a left back before we sold Zinc. A sound defender but now even if we put a square peg in a round hole with Ake or Laporte we could do with one who can get forward in wide areas.

The problem isn’t necessarily that we won’t pay the fee as we aren’t aware of the full asking price, the problem is we have arsed about for too long deciding he is too expensive if that is where we are at.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.