Marc Cucurella

  • Thread starter Thread starter ElleBla
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I see we are taking the Cucu situation well then -:)

1 game where the team was not up to speed and all hell has broken loose.

Let me guess:

The club is shit
Txiki useless
How could we sell Zin?
Pay the fucking money
Best window to worst window
Anyone now linked is inferior to a player we had never heard of not 1 year ago.

Why City? Fucking why?

As you were peeps!

Pretty much covers it mate.

I’d save yourself the mither and log off now if I were you!
 
You still here? Chelsea have a forum you know... (just kidding)

Pep may have been interested (I have no idea on that) but Pep being interested in a player doesn't mean they've suddenly turned world class after 12 months...

We know Brighton value him at £50m and fair do's - you can stick any price tag on any player you want but price is not the same as value - it would be a huge risk for us at £30m but an insane risk at £50m IMHO
Your post is more insane than thinking a quality left back, at 24 years of age and years on his contract, being bought for 50m being insane.

We bought Phillips for 42m a player out for most of last year and had a good year the year before. Two years older and primarily brought in to be Rodri’s back up. Seems we pick and choose when we want to penny pinch
 
999 pages of posts on the board
999 pages of posts
Add one more, and what have you got...
 
I see we are taking the Cucu situation well then -:)

1 game where the team was not up to speed and all hell has broken loose.

Let me guess:

The club is shit
Txiki useless
How could we sell Zin?
Pay the fucking money
Best window to worst window
Anyone now linked is inferior to a player we had never heard of not 1 year ago.

Why City? Fucking why?

As you were peeps!
Anyone order a happy clapper
 
Brighton were not saying £30m. They have said all along £50m. Please shiw me where you got the £30m from.
don't care what brighton value him. your greedy club can try whatever they can to distort and destroy the market with unfair and ridiculous valuations. city is a a properly run business and we do not plan to be like brighton we have a sustainable long term model. everything works on our valuation and nothing else.
 
Why do we have to make do with all these makeshifts though? It’s like when people say stones can play right back. Technically he can as he’s a right footed professional defender. Doesnt mean he does it well or doesn’t disrupt our attacking flow. Full backs are key in this side, it’s why that second summer we went balls deep on upgrading them which is why I find it so odd we’ve just happily ignored the left back position and happily just throw anyone with a left foot there.
Bang on the money there, can Stones Laporte and Ake cover fullback? Yes they have done it but hand on heart has anyone thought fuck me how good was that they should play there more often. Not heard that once myself. Would they even be happy doing it? Probably not. I thought we needed a left back before we sold Zinc. A sound defender but now even if we put a square peg in a round hole with Ake or Laporte we could do with one who can get forward in wide areas.

The problem isn’t necessarily that we won’t pay the fee as we aren’t aware of the full asking price, the problem is we have arsed about for too long deciding he is too expensive if that is where we are at.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top