Marc Cucurella

Status
Not open for further replies.
I’ll take pannings all day, every day if we pile up the trophies. It really isn’t an “insane “ fee. It was probably 25-30% higher than our offer. “Insane” would be offering 100-150 million. 55-60 million for a player under contract in the prem, who has the potential to help the team run the league/ champs league etc is other going rate. Chelsea have beaten us to it on this one. No denying it, no covering or buttering it up with talk of “over the odds “ etc. Plain and simple, we’ve lost out here.
Keep your knickers on , too high so we bailed
 
They've overpaid, Brighton must be laughing their socks off.
Now we know why our club went quiet on the transfer. Quite rightly, they weren’t going to be ripped off. £57m + £5m in add ons is ridiculous but annoyingly - if we’d paid that the headlines would have been very different in a negative way.
 
Overpaid, never a £55million plus add-ons player, it's a gamble and one Manchester city don't make any more,
Chelsea needs to gamble in the transfer market and try and bridge the gap back to us and Liverpool, much like united have been doing for the last 7 years,
 
What’s more of a gamble; hoping Walker and Cancelo can both play every game this season without injury/suspension, or spending over £50m to ensure there‘s not much drop in quality that costs us points or a cup when either misses some games?
 
The issue isn’t spending an extra 10/15 million, it’s the principle. It’s took years for us to lose that city premium, giving into unrealistic demands because we’re desperate will bring it back.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.