Marc Cucurella

  • Thread starter Thread starter ElleBla
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry but your reply makes no sense at all pal. Mind boggling, like i say
What's mind boggling is you not being able to get your head around the idea that once we wasted £50m on one unproven full-back, we might not rush do make the same mistake again.

Also if £12m is such a small amount why don't you donate it? Then we can sign Cucurella.
 
...10 million

Maybe our 3 club shareholders want to start seeing some money returned to them?

According to Transfer Market City are +£46mill on transfers this Summer.

Which with a small amount of add-ons up to £50mill, which Bloom was after, would have taken City to -£4mill on transfers this Summer.

Hmmm.
The figures from transfer market aren’t right though as they have missed off a number of EDS sales
 
Maybe our 3 club shareholders want to start seeing some money returned to them?

According to Transfer Market City are +£46mill on transfers this Summer.

Which with a small amount of add-ons up to £50mill, which Bloom was after, would have taken City to -£4mill on transfers this Summer.

Hmmm.

As was always the plan. Many City fans do not want to see that though.
Investment demands return.
 
Maybe our 3 club shareholders want to start seeing some money returned to them?

According to Transfer Market City are +£46mill on transfers this Summer.

Which with a small amount of add-ons up to £50mill, which Bloom was after, would have taken City to -£4mill on transfers this Summer.

Hmmm.

We are circa plus £120m at the moment. brought in some 230m (250m with reported add-ons), spent around 110m including reported add-ons.
 
I've just learnt that ffp only gets looked at every 3 years. Makes sense to why we're not pushing for cucumberella.
 
What's mind boggling is you not being able to get your head around the idea that once we wasted £50m on one unproven full-back, we might not rush do make the same mistake again.

Also if £12m is such a small amount why don't you donate it? Then we can sign Cucurella.
Cucuella proved himself to have an excellent first season in the PL. Mendy was great for Monaco but proved himself to be a complete flop for us. I very much doubt we'd be making the same mistake but every signing is a gamble. For whatever reason we have baulked at paying what Brighton want

And considering how much City have made from players sold this summer i doubt they need any donation to make up the shortfall to sign Cuco. I can't get my head round the situation we now find ourselves in going into the new season having sold Zinchenko with no replacement.
 
It seems to me that, if there is truth to this Chelsea business, it rather changes the complexion of the matter. OK, we don't rate him at £50 million.
But what this now amounts to is that not only do we leave him at Brighton — that would have been o.k., I was fine with it, we could have always gone back next summer. But we now let a direct rival strengthen in recruiting him.
It is, to say the least, regrettable.

Yeah by all means, treat Zinchenko like a dick holding the player back for his long time service to the club. The player wants out and doesn't want to wait whether Cucu or any incoming LB is coming or not.

Unlike some club and user on this forum, our club treating their player especially a good servant like Zinchenko very well and will not holding him back if he pushes for the move and we have a good price for him.

He needs to be careful Tuchel already reported as being unhappy.
Fuck Tuchel.
Precedent suggests we should be calm. Missing out on transfers often proves a dodged bullet. Jorginho, Maguire, Ronaldo, Koulibaly, Kane... If I had to guess right now, I'd guess we get in a left-back who's largely agreed to be better than Cucurella three years from now. But then I still don't really get the Cucurella hype.
I've said the same thing but why is Jorginho on this list?
But you can add Alexis Sanchez and Fred while you're at it.
 
It baffles me how some use Mendy as an example of value as if we knew the type of bellend he was when we bought him and decided to pay it anyway.

When we got him, he’d just come off the back of a fantastic season winning the league with Monaco and taking the piss out of many teams, us included, in the Champions League.

The signing itself was perfect for us and how Pep wanted to play and was looking promising until the injury and the obvious other stuff too.
 
It baffles me how some use Mendy as an example of value as if we knew the type of bellend he was when we bought him and decided to pay it anyway.

When we got him, he’d just come off the back of a fantastic season winning the league with Monaco and taking the piss out of many teams, us included, in the Champions League.

The signing itself was perfect for us and how Pep wanted to play and was looking promising until the injury and the obvious other stuff too.
No excuse mate,Mystic Meg should have been recruited to our back room staff years ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top