Chris in London
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 13,328
tolmie's hairdoo said:Aphex said:tolmie's hairdoo said:You don't get it, do you?
It's a hypothetical thread about what is best for not just us, but Mario also.
A myth has been perpetuated, to a degree, and can be reflected in the unwarranted yellow cards.
All the same, propoganda is bullshit. He's kicked someone in the fucking head and has let himself and the team down AGAIN.
Regadless of intent, he had previous for it, and that's proved his undoing this time.
His reputation, forged to a large degree by himself, is the reason he has become an easy target.
Difference is, sadly, I think the lad will never be able to realise it in this country.
It's gone too far.
So my hypothetical analysis of him is moot?
Most people on this thread also disagree with your opinion, do they not get it also?
No they don't, clearly.
The post isn't about the analysis of Mario as a player, his qualities etc. The op is even caveated to acknowledge my own personal appreciation for him.
It's about never being able to counter his reputation going before him, and how it will affect both City and him in the future.
Hence, throwing the question out about what should we do, including a hypothesis of an acutal sale.
In posters' rush to defend Mario, all very commendable and expected, the thread quickly moved away from the original premise/argument.
If Mario feels it's all too much and he himself wants away, there is precious little we can do about it. The real question is, if Mario is happy to stay, is it better for us to get rid nonetheless?
I think not.
First, I would genuinely hate to lose what Mario brings us on the pitch. He is an exceptional talent. Even accepting that this comes at a price, IMO it is a price worth paying.
Secondly, the silver lining to the current cloud - as with VK's sending off and various other instances too numerous to mention - is that it is creating a real 'us against the world' mentality both among team and fans that is IMO beneficial. To sell him may well (a) undermine that, and (b) give the impression of caving in under pressure.
Thirdly, the fact that the fans do love him for his off-pitch stuff has a very direct influence on the pitch. Two reasons IMO for this. One, when Mario comes on as he did on Sunday, the entire place is lifted. The crowd gets a lift. The team gets a lift from the crowd. Two, Mario is IMO more motivated to play well when he feels loved, as he does here. So we may well get substantially more out of Mario than we might get out of a like-for-like (almost) replacement like Cavanni. Not that he's a bad player, just that Mario seems to me to have a higher than normal degree of motivation, especially for a player fromt he Italian league.
Finally, as things stand for me the benefits of having Mario outweigh the downside, but as time goes by he is more likely to mature, less likely to be so combustible. I suspect it will always be part of his game, but equally I suspect that as time goes by, referees will be more aware of players trying to provoke him, Mario will have a greater degree of self control, and so on. We all know that Huth did him in the FA Cup final. We all know how well he managed that situation. He can keep a lid on it, but ATM often he doesn't: with greater maturity, IMO he will find that easier to achieve.
So the upside already outweighs the downside at the moment, and the benefits are likely IMO to be greater in the future.