Aphex said:
tolmie's hairdoo said:
No they don't, clearly.
The post isn't about the analysis of Mario as a player, his qualities etc. The op is even caveated to acknowledge my own personal appreciation for him.
It's about never being able to counter his reputation going before him, and how it will affect both City and him in the future.
Hence, throwing the question out about what should we do, including a hypothesis of an acutal sale.
In posters' rush to defend Mario, all very commendable and expected, the thread quickly moved away from the original premise/argument.
It's your argument, but you have left it open to an awful lot of interpretation
By the way, why are you talking about yourself in the third person...? :)
Not that the third person was intentional, ha ha!
Well, simply put, I initiated the thread, and as a result, the topic of debate has become more about how ridiculous it was for me to even impart a hypothesis.
I can't legislate for posters who allow their rush to defend Mario get in the way of properly discussing the actual debate being put forward.
To recap, you remarked this was the most ridiculous thread ever seen on Blue Moon, which I don't believe the OP left it open to different interpretation.
Blues are hurting, turning on each other, seeing things which aren't even there. Feeling persecuted.
The premise of my original argument remains pertinent - Mario can't win and will continue to be an easy target, regardless of continuing to improve his own attitude.
It leaves City with an ongoing dilemma.