Just a small point, he was a marked man in Italy too. That's down to racism which a lot of people aren't prepared to admit tootolmie's hairdoo said:Chris in London said:Didsbury Dave said:That has always been the case of course...the madness comes as part of the package. But the price is getting higher, not lower, and therein lies the rub. And Tolm makes an extrememly valid point...his reputation now has upped that price even further.
I agree entirely that it's a valid debate. I agree entirely Mario is a marked man I just disagree with the conclusion reached by some that we are better off getting rid.
With 4 fit and functining strikers, we would rotate them anyway. The problem is worse right now because of Tevez. But once we are up to full strength, we can look on Mario's inevitable suspensions as part of the rotation process...
;-)
The thread was playing Devils' Advocate, nothing more.
Personally, I love Mario to bits, I don't see or speak to a blue who doesn't.
Now taking that out of the equation, forget the press aspect, also.
Mario IS a marked man and will continue to be so until he leaves English football.
Call it corrupt, calling agenda, whatever you want.
He is a convenient scapegoat for opposition fans when we play away from home, a leverage every time he attempts a physical challenge.
The Parker incident will ramp this up x10. Mario can act like a saint, but in the eyes of officials, they will continually have the instinct to act first, ask questions later.
They are covered either way by the rules and retrospective action.
Doesn't help us if we are down to ten men at Old Trafford and the ref decides two days later he got it wrong.
Mario has to beat his critics.