A
A
Anonymous
Guest
ANY1aBLUE said:bluethai said:Fellani is better than Barry and De Jong, that's why.citizens_1976 said:Really can't see why we would go for Fellaini. He would cost 15m+ and he's a very average midfielder. I don't see where this ''top 4 player'' material comes from. I'd probably take Coloccini if we can get him cheap but I really don't like the idea of Fellaini.
Most sensible post on this site for weeks!
Fellaini is better than BOTH of them put together i.e. we would only have to play with ONE holding midfield player. Therefore one more attacking player can be played.
Felliaini better than barry and de jong based on what, barry and de jong were integral parts to our season and without them we probably wouldnt have won the league