malg
Well-Known Member
Mason Greenwood is……..
It’s all over Twitter and social media.
Video, pictures, and audio.
Not going to post it in BM.
Mason Greenwood is……..
It’s all over Twitter and social media.
Video, pictures, and audio.
Not going to post it in BM.
unless you posted by page 3 on here then it was already on the BBC site, I spotted it and came to make a thread and this one was already on page 3 by then.It wasn’t when I posted my comment though.
Because he famously (and presciently) wrote about a world where technology was deployed as a means of surveillance - which is the conduit through which this story has occurred and gathered momentum. On that basis, it’s perfectly reasonable to use his book as a reference point, and identify something that (quite understandably) he did not anticipate; not as a means of criticism, but to identify an unexpected consequence of his broader prediction about a society with much greater levels of surveillance (upon which he was conspicuously correct).So why use Orwell as an example of an author who 'failed to anticipate' the future 'exponential advances in technology' when you have just asked 'Who could possibly have imagined' such an advancement, suggesting that nobody could have?
Some on red cafe seem to think cops have already been involved, and this leak today is because their case is already set. Makes sense I suppose. October to now.first is there been video evidence ? pictures can speak a thousands words
audio evidence not the same ? yes she claims its greenwood and pictures/audio of the crime have been leaked.
but until the police have done it job then the case is unproven
from what i know ? when things like this happen and it get leaked into the media before the police get involved it can damage the case. the police need to get both sides of the story and any witnesses DNA and mobile phones from both
because of the media leak it can damage the case and without witnesses it can lead to pressure to drop the case
or settle out of court it ? can happen and has happen loads of times
Some on red cafe seem to think cops have already been involved, and this leak today is because their case is already set. Makes sense I suppose. October to now.
unless you posted by page 3 on here then it was already on the BBC site, I spotted it and came to make a thread and this one was already on page 3 by then.
You are commenting without seeing what has been posted.first is there been video evidence ? pictures can speak a thousands words
audio evidence not the same ? yes she claims its greenwood and pictures/audio of the crime have been leaked.
but until the police have done it job then the case is unproven
from what i know ? when things like this happen and it get leaked into the media before the police get involved it can damage the case. the police need to get both sides of the story and any witnesses DNA and mobile phones from both
because of the media leak it can damage the case and without witnesses it can lead to pressure to drop the case
or settle out of court it ? can happen and has happen loads of times