Daz_Blue
Well-Known Member
Would be the funniest thing ever if the sheikh came in with a 50m offer ....LMAO
Blow Gollum out of the water
Blow Gollum out of the water
tolmie's hairdoo said:Good player, but let's not start rewriting history, eh!
He's been absolutely no-mark against us since he arrived at Chelsea.
We've beaten his team for fun these last couple years, a team, with considerably more talent than United have at present.
For the £40m cost of Mata, City have bought Silva and Navas.
He would have to get used to sitting on the bench in this City side.
For more context, we paid £24m for Nasri.
Based on Nasri's showings this season, nobody can tell me Mata is worth £16m more, irrespective of what those desperado lot are willing to pay.
tolmie's hairdoo said:Good player, but let's not start rewriting history, eh!
He's been absolutely no-mark against us since he arrived at Chelsea.
We've beaten his team for fun these last couple years, a team, with considerably more talent than United have at present.
For the £40m cost of Mata, City have bought Silva and Navas.
He would have to get used to sitting on the bench in this City side.
For more context, we paid £24m for Nasri.
Based on Nasri's showings this season, nobody can tell me Mata is worth £16m more, irrespective of what those desperado lot are willing to pay.
So the only way to judge a player is if he can destroy City? How has the Chelsea team had more talent than United in the few years when they have finished so far behind them?tolmie's hairdoo said:Good player, but let's not start rewriting history, eh!
He's been absolutely no-mark against us since he arrived at Chelsea.
We've beaten his team for fun these last couple years, a team, with considerably more talent than United have at present.
For the £40m cost of Mata, City have bought Silva and Navas.
He would have to get used to sitting on the bench in this City side.
For more context, we paid £24m for Nasri.
Based on Nasri's showings this season, nobody can tell me Mata is worth £16m more, irrespective of what those desperado lot are willing to pay.
Big Dave Watson said:tolmie's hairdoo said:Good player, but let's not start rewriting history, eh!
He's been absolutely no-mark against us since he arrived at Chelsea.
We've beaten his team for fun these last couple years, a team, with considerably more talent than United have at present.
For the £40m cost of Mata, City have bought Silva and Navas.k
He would have to get used to sitting on the bench in this City side.
For more context, we paid £24m for Nasri.
Based on Nasri's showings this season, nobody can tell me Mata is worth £16m more, irrespective of what those desperado lot are willing to pay.
So is this happening then?