nijinsky's fetlocks
Well-Known Member
M18CTID said:nijinsky's fetlocks said:M18CTID said:You know for a fact that PB's theory wasn't the only one being discussed. There were plenty of scenarios debated in that thread and you point blank refused to acknowledge the possibility that some sort of corruption may be prevalent in the game over here.
Could you possibly show me some actual hard evidence to substantiate just one of those scenarios?
I know you think we're being arsey here,but not believing something until such time as it is proven is not a bad way to live your life.
God botherers get no end of grief on 'religion' threads for stating that god definitely exists,whilst providing no proof,other than 'well,that's what I believe'.
Yet sceptics like Cookie and me get grief on here for demanding proof of corruption.
Crikey NF, I'm only saying that it's a possibility, not that it's a definite. There's nothing wrong with keeping an open mind on something in the absence of "hard evidence".
Then we agree mate - it is a possibility,and if it turns out that football is as rotten as the two year old Balti pie I found in the boot of my car the other day then I will be the first to fess up that I was wrong.
But you must admit that some of the conspiracy theories doing the rounds a while back were a tad bizarre,and that's using Pauldominic's posts as a yardstick.