Match of the Day - 2022/23

[old blue]

Did not the CP player scream for a foul just a few minutes earlier which was not given, rightfully. I thought that Ayew was giving a bit back.

 

[34yearsandstillgoingstrong]

Forearm smash? Ha ha , you’d be brilliant as a lawyer. Every fucker would be on death row. He got tickled.

Crikey! I hope you don't playfully "tickle" the wife tonight . You could be joining Giggsy and Mason on "death row" .

 

[Saddleworth2]

It was definitely a foul and a possible red. The ref missed it and I'm not sure var can get involved at that point.

surely VAR should be checking for serious foul play?

 

[Blue Mist]

It was definitely a foul and a possible red. The ref missed it and I'm not sure var can get involved at that point.

The linesman was yards away. For him to miss/ignore it is disgraceful. He should have informed VAR who could then look at it for a possible red (although imo, it wasn't but to simply ignore it !)

 

[denislawsbackheel]

Still waiting for Sky to jump on it.... personally it's a big fat red for me, there's even movement.

When you think back to the yellow ticker red Kun had against Villa to miss the raggy game....it's almost like it's fixed.

Because no media, at least from what I've seen are making it an issue or even mentioning it does not mean nothing happened.

*For the record their third should have counted but had proper action been taken around the Cancelo incident a 1-0 lead and 10 men the chances are the 'third' wouldn't have happened anyway

You don’t know the rules if you think the third should have stood.
Keepers must be allowed to release the ball unimpeded.

 

[johnnytapia]

You don’t know the rules if you think the third should have stood.
Keepers must be allowed to release the ball unimpeded.

He wasn’t impeded. It was a perfectly good goal.

 

[TheBlueDune]

You don’t know the rules if you think the third should have stood.
Keepers must be allowed to release the ball unimpeded.

Law 12.
A goalkeeper is considered to be in control of the ball with the hand(s) when the ball is between the hands or between the hand and any surface (e.g. ground, own body).

Keeper is in control of the ball when between hand and ground.
Impeding the keeper while in control of the ball is a foul.

Ederson released the ball but the ball hit the palace player's outstretched foot before rolling on the ground. Therefore still in ederson's control and a foul.
Ref blew whistle as soon as happened before other palace player kicked it. Play stopped before being kicked.
Correct decision by ref.
Stopped play meant kick at goal invalid.
No goal.

Pundits as often not knowing the laws of the game they are allegedly experts in.

 

[I'm With Stupid]

Yep, it's been against the rules since that time Thierry Henry nicked it off a goalkeeper and scored. How can anyone not know that rule?

 

[chesterbells]

Law 12.
A goalkeeper is considered to be in control of the ball with the hand(s) when the ball is between the hands or between the hand and any surface (e.g. ground, own body).

Keeper is in control of the ball when between hand and ground.
Impeding the keeper while in control of the ball is a foul.

Ederson released the ball but the ball hit the palace player's outstretched foot before rolling on the ground. Therefore still in ederson's control and a foul.
Ref blew whistle as soon as happened before other palace player kicked it. Play stopped before being kicked.
Correct decision by ref.
Stopped play meant kick at goal invalid.
No goal.

Pundits as often not knowing the laws of the game they are allegedly experts in.

Take a bow.

 

[denislawsbackheel]

He wasn’t impeded. It was a perfectly good goal.

Plank