Chippy_boy
Well-Known Member
I thought the best one was to build new trident subs but not let them carry the nuclear missiles.
Apparently he's been talking to Viking River Cruises about offering them as boutique holiday options.
I thought the best one was to build new trident subs but not let them carry the nuclear missiles.
... and bankrupt the company and put them all out of work.
Thanks for letting me know, but I suspected as much.
But you wouldn't increase pay by more than you can afford?
Are we at 'peak' Corbyn or do you think there is more fun to come?
Which would mean you couldn't increase the CEO's either and then he goes to America and you have to hire someone cheap to replace him. How would that be good?
CEO's aren't the only high earners though are they."According to several non-profit groups, shareholders are fundamentally unable to rein in excessive pay at the biggest companies."
The FT
U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May will outline plans this fall to clamp down on “excessive” executive pay, after one of her lawmakers last week criticized high compensation levels for FTSE 100 bosses as “socially divisive.”
Bloomberg
"The average pay for chief executives of firms in the FTSE 100 index is now 144 times that of the UK's average salary, says the High Pay Centre.
The BBC
Excessive executive pay has hurt public trust in business….
Excessive boardroom pay risks undermining public trust in big business, the accountancy regulator has said in a report calling for a concerted effort to increase trust in the way that companies are run.
The Guardian
MPs Launch inquiry into soaring executive pay...
Parliamentary committee will look at whether government should have power to curb remuneration
The Week
There are articles in the Economist, the Times, the Telegraph and many more on the evils of excessive executive pay, but of course, it's just Jeremy and his envious Trots.
For those who can't be arsed to do any research at all and are content to bleat reactionary platitudes. Excessive executive pay way beyond anything justifiable in terms of performance is theft, it is stealing money from the company that should be paid, at the very least, to the investors in that company, and it is stealing from its workers by taking an unjustifiable slice of "value added" that the workforce has contributed to the success of the company and the executive has not.
Not envy just the wage structure for the low paid and the high paid is so vast and I'm not blaming people who gets paid it as the majority of people wouldn't turn it down if it was offered to them but I feel he has a point