He is quite shameless in his punditry. I think he is taking the piss and taking the rag media cash. So what?Reading the script is all but still, has he no fucking shame?
He is quite shameless in his punditry. I think he is taking the piss and taking the rag media cash. So what?Reading the script is all but still, has he no fucking shame?
He is quite shameless in his punditry. I think he is taking the piss and taking the rag media cash. So what?
Regarding the mini love-in going on just now with Trevor Sinclair, he has just said on TalkShite this very morning that Pep would better suit the rags. I hope he was just being "fair and balanced" with his punditry....
You must of been listening to something else, he seemed negative towards the ragsRegarding the mini love-in going on just now with Trevor Sinclair, he has just said on TalkShite this very morning that Pep would better suit the rags. I hope he was just being "fair and balanced" with his punditry....
Danny Murphy on the whole is a fair pundit with regards to City...
When we talk about Media Bias the below is a good example. It isnt a corporate sponsored bias piece of journalism, it is though a piece by an ex Arsenal player (ex-Arsenal,ex-Manure, ex-Liverpool - dont matter there are lots of them in the media) where the pressure is ratcheted up against City, Keown knows what he is doing, all of the ex players know it when they report on their ex clubs.
The net result of all these little bias' add up to an uphill struggle that City are going to face for the next few years until some of our ex players are "Supporting" us in the media.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/35122427
No media bias then tell me why the press aren't attacking Bryan Riggs at the swamp for his piss poor Machiavellian impersonation at the swamp that even rags are now recognising?
How remiss of me.Yes but he's one of the class of 92 and we should never forget all they've done for their country and their continuing and tireless work for gammy children.