Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
Phil1 said:
I’ll never forgive @SWP's back for having a weekly golf game with Richard Keys and not once wrapping his 9 iron around his fat fucking head.

Very disappointing.
Click to expand...
Yeah I’m also pretty annoyed with myself in hindsight. Not sure why I’m letting myself get wound up though, he doesn’t believe a word of 90% of the things he says. It’s always “to have a debate” or ‘conversation’.
 
SWP's back said:
Yeah I’m also pretty annoyed with myself in hindsight. Not sure why I’m letting myself get wound up though, he doesn’t believe a word of 90% of the things he says. It’s always “to have a debate” or ‘conversation’.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I get it’s mostly a character for clicks but fuck me, he’s got miles worse when it comes to us, or more factually Pep in recent months. He really comes across as having a genuine hatred of him. It’s fucking weird.
I have most of our games on Bein in the bars and whilst I usually don’t pay attention to any before or after discussion, whenever I’ve dipped my toe in to listen to him and Gray I have to fuck it off within seconds because I feel the blood pressure rise instantly!! Haha!
 
Gorton_Tubster said:
We've had two players injured now whilst the lino keeps his flag down.

If that is lfc or arsenal, utd players (especially), getting injured there would be a campaign by the media to get the rule changed.

As it is, it has injured City players so they don't give a shit. But wait until this impacts one of theirs. Then everyone will read about the damage that rule is causing. But it needs changing for gods sake
Click to expand...
100% I've been a moaning twat regards this all season.
Could City claim lost of earnings for the 2 players we have lost
 
BBC United - Medicacity, dedicated Manchester United reporter, paid for by the TV licence fee payer, Sly Stone, has penned a very long article on BBC Football.

Just the headline and the picture is enough.

IMG_0203.jpeg

BBC Sport at their press office inside Old Trafford.
 
jrb said:
BBC United - Medicacity, dedicated Manchester United reporter, paid for by the TV licence fee payer, Sly Stone, has penned a very long article on BBC Football.

Just the headline and the picture is enough.

View attachment 104152

BBC Sport at their press office inside Old Trafford.
Click to expand...
Obscene how much media attention is given to this minority shareholder. The BBC are taking the piss. Might as well get Lucky Jim to post his daily diary on the BBC Sport Website.
 
stan bowles said:
Obscene how much media attention is given to this minority shareholder. The BBC are taking the piss. Might as well get Lucky Jim to post his daily diary on the BBC Sport Website.
Click to expand...

When you dig down you'll find another grifter who is going to milk the rags for all they are worth, after all he isn't in it for that altruistic nonsense is he?
 
mexico1970 said:
When you dig down you'll find another grifter who is going to milk the rags for all they are worth, after all he isn't in it for that altruistic nonsense is he?
Click to expand...
It's a load of bollocks trying to convince everyone of a "new dawn" at the Swamp. Sly Stone must be working 24/7 to keep posting bullshit articles about Ratcliffe.
 
stan bowles said:
It's a load of bollocks trying to convince everyone of a "new dawn" at the Swamp. Sly Stone must be working 24/7 to keep posting bullshit articles about Ratcliffe.
Click to expand...
I’d say like a few others,these pricks are most likely paid by certain clubs to write or publish constant articles about them,it’s not about clicks but keeping them relevant in the eyes of those browsing,listening or reading articles..
 
IMG_0669.jpeg
Can we help out these poor befuddled Athletic journalists? Why can’t Newcastle match City’s spending?

I’d suggest that the prize money from 7 Premier Leagues, 3 FA Cups, 1 Champions League win, 1 CL runners-up, 2 CL semi-finals etc in the last dozen years might have put a teensy bit of distance between us and teams who haven’t won a thing in forever.
 
DenisHasDoneIt said:
View attachment 104159
Can we help out these poor befuddled Athletic journalists? Why can’t Newcastle match City’s spending?

I’d suggest that the prize money from 7 Premier Leagues, 3 FA Cups, 1 Champions League win, 1 CL runners-up, 2 CL semi-finals etc in the last dozen years might have put a teensy bit of distance between us and teams who haven’t won a thing in forever.
Click to expand...
Plus an academy that produces liquid gold
 
DenisHasDoneIt said:
View attachment 104159
Can we help out these poor befuddled Athletic journalists? Why can’t Newcastle match City’s spending?

I’d suggest that the prize money from 7 Premier Leagues, 3 FA Cups, 1 Champions League win, 1 CL runners-up, 2 CL semi-finals etc in the last dozen years might have put a teensy bit of distance between us and teams who haven’t won a thing in forever.
Click to expand...
Simon Jordan has said that due to Mike Ashley's husbandry Newcastle would have plenty of leeway to spend in January.
We now learn that they can only buy if they sell.
Sums up Jordan's superior knowledge perfectly.
This is the expert Talk sport wheel out to pontificate about us while he is clearly clueless.
 
Has anybody else noticed the spending chart on the sky sports news app,for 2022/23 period?They’ve got the rags down as spending a paltry £22 mill!WTAF?How much did that dud Anthony cost them again?Not much chance of an investigation coming their way,when they have national news outlets covering their tracks for them!They can do what they f’kin want that lot…it’s a disgrace.
 
DenisHasDoneIt said:
I’d suggest that the prize money from 7 Premier Leagues, 3 FA Cups, 1 Champions League win, 1 CL runners-up, 2 CL semi-finals etc in the last dozen years might have put a teensy bit of distance between us and teams who haven’t won a thing in forever.
Click to expand...

You’d be wrong then, perhaps give it a listen?

Theres only one thing stopping Newcastle from spending like City and that’s FFP.

If Newcastle had been taken over 3 years before the adoption of FFP they’d have spent like us too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PPT
domalino said:
You’d be wrong then, perhaps give it a listen?

Theres only one thing stopping Newcastle from spending like City and that’s FFP.

If Newcastle had been taken over 3 years before the adoption of FFP they’d have spent like us too.
Click to expand...
Did Newcastle vote for or against ffp introduction?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top