"Alleged artificial inflation of sponsorship deals" ha ha they always put that even though its not.An example of the true standard of " journalism " presented by the the click chasing media , clearly demonstrated with every incorrect article they produce.
Clearly accuracy is the very least of their intentions when producing such blatantly incorrect and flawed pieces.
Should be confined to the waste bin .
"Alleged artificial inflation of sponsorship deals" ha ha they always put that even though its not.
Not many people can do a job all day and get the basic points completely wrong.
Good job he's not an electrician or something.
I heard Shebahn Aherne laugh saying hopefully Erling is injured against the dippers as well.I put Talk Shite on this morning for just 10 minutes while I got up & dressed this morning, A clip of Simon Jordan saying "Liverpool play far more entertaining football than city"?
A woman called Shaban ohearn? saying "I wish Earling Haaland would get injured"? and the boiled bollock that is Alan Brazil saying "the city Liverpool game should be great because of the noise the away fans will make"?
& some people think there is no agenda.
What can we sing about?Just wait until Saturday evening when we'll be on the national news singing songs that are not about Hillsborough.
United also had their "cantilever" paid for pre 66 World Cup so big advantage for them for those next few decades. Think he forgot that one ...Didn't we also pay the £20 odd million to finish the North stand after the games? In which case we've paid everything back.
It's ours
In the case of the dippers let off completely. Twice.Yep, so why haven’t the rag’s been successful after spending more than us? Klopp is copying Pep in certain areas. Btw, both the Rags and Dippers have been found guilty of FFP regulations and financial misconduct but are let off relatively scot free.
Wasn’t it tax payers money that paid for the old Trafford rebuild after WW2United also had their "cantilever" paid for pre 66 World Cup so big advantage for them for those next few decades. Think he forgot that one ...
Yep. Chairman James Gibson relentlessly lobbied the War Damage Commission to pay the full cost of clearing the debris and rebuilding the stands and eventually they agreed. No suggestion of brown envelopes of course.Wasn’t it tax payers money that paid for the old Trafford rebuild after WW2
You misheard. They said "broad cat's arse".By thetime I heard the show, they were interviewing "broadcaster" Mark Goldbridge !!
They may be watching but having read the article, it is clear that in some regards the writer is bringing a number of preconceptions to the article - for example there was no consideration that the journalists who are 'de-legitimised' were not legitimate and were not acting in good faith in the first place. I agree that some of the more extreme views on this forum do attack any criticism (even when legitimate), however this must be considered in what many people on here consider to be an organised and sustained attack on the club we love. Criticism (and mockery) of certain bad faith journalists is perfectly legitimate, in my and many fans views.Someone watching blue moon forum.