Media Discussion - 2023/24

[Manc Born & Bred]

Can someone put the clip on when it's available?

 

[invisibleandalone]

Masters and his pals are finished. The independent regulator bill is going through today. The Everton/Forest shambles is the last act in this farce. The anti-City narrative is a PR strategy but it is only working with the total morons. City are backing the new regulator and a better payout for EFL clubs and the Cartel clubs don’t like it though United have softened their position. A smart move by Ratcliffe who can see the way the wind is blowing.

Sir Steptoe is a rat, his stance appears to be friendly, but is just a ploy in buttering everybody up. Firstly to use our ground and to open the governments vault to build the new swamp.

 

[TinFoilHat]

Slapping down Jordan over the Etihad contract and using witnessing who lied at CAS.

 

[manimanc]

Jordan is like Vicky Pollard.

Yeah but no but yeah but.

Fuckin moron that fella is.

 

[ZanteWeatherman]

There’s a section of fucktards on here that agree with that.
We live in strange times.

I’ve never argued with any poster who has been fair in their criticism.
Unfortunately some seem incapable of constructive criticism and resort to bashing their skulls on the keyboard. At least that’s what it looks like reading some of the shit posted.

B-b-but Micah Richards is still an utter knob, and Barton is still a fuckstain. Dunces that got lucky, the pair of them

 

[Kippax77]

There’s a reason why in his early days on tour Westwood and his best mate (can’t remember his name now) were known as ‘Dumb & Dumber’.

Does Westwood still need a crane to lower him onto the putting green?

Ian Poulter would be his sidekick I think

 

[Vintage68]

Steffan should just tell Jordan to shut the fuck up and stop talking over me. Whilst Steffan obliterated Jordans arguments (desperation springs to mind) the ill informed listening in will always believe his SJ's anger and view. However thankfully Steffan knows far more than SJ as it is his expertise. I know who i am backing and it isn't Simon Jordan.

 

[solley attwell]

Jordan making out that City want the investigation private when Stefan pointed out that the PL want to keep it private aswell. Jordan in a miny stutter

 

[theres only one carlito]

Jordan making out that City want the investigation private when Stefan pointed out that the PL want to keep it private aswell. Jordan in a miny stutter

The guys a professional WUM. He thinks his opinion is the only one that should matter and that rules of the land and hearings should be somehow different because it’s football?

He actually thinks football is sat on some pedastal that should overide the laws of the land. Because he says so! He’s a Dick

 

[spiny]

Jordan. Bar room boor. Know it all who doesnt listen. Tried to talk over Stefan who put him straight. Jordan still didnt want to hear as it conflicted with his set views.

 

[Rochdale Blue]

B-b-but Micah Richards is still an utter knob, and Barton is still a fuckstain. Dunces that got lucky, the pair of them

Think it was a boxing day game at Wigan and we got absolutely hammered, Barton was the only City player to come over to the City fans to applaud them. Micah can be annoying at times but the stick he gets off some so-called blues is way over the top.

 

[Moss Side's Finest]

I don’t think that’s working. Just because thick fuckers are getting air time blaming City the majority are becoming aware of what’s happening.

You only need to look on social media to see that it's not only rags and scousers who think we're guilty now, most people believe there has to be at least something in it from what they have been fed by the media

 

[Exeter Blue I am here]

Jordan making out that City want the investigation private when Stefan pointed out that the PL want to keep it private aswell. Jordan in a miny stutter

I remember the judge ruling on that after the Daily Mail, I think, stuck its oar in.
One of our legally savvy number can probably clarify this, but why did both sides want everything heard in private? What would have been the benefit for City? What would have been the benefit for the PL?

Also, on an entirely different matter, whilst an email is just evidence of an email, would there actually have been anything wrong with the AD Executive Authority covering the £59m balance of the Etihad deal?

 

[cheekybids]

You only need to look on social media to see that it's not only rags and scousers who think we're guilty now, most people believe there has to be at least something in it from what they have been fed by the media

I think social media gives a distorted view, it’s not that many but it seems it.

 

[cheekybids]

I remember the judge ruling on that after the Daily Mail, I think, stuck its oar in.
One of our legally savvy number can probably clarify this, but why did both sides want everything heard in private? What would have been the benefit for City? What would have been the benefit for the PL?

Also, on an entirely different matter, whilst an email is just evidence of an email, would there actually have been anything wrong with the AD Executive Authority covering the £59m balance of the Etihad deal?

& who grasses to the media to get it in the public domain.

 

[Exeter Blue I am here]

& who grasses to the media to get it in the public domain.

?

 

[TinFoilHat]

?

I assume he's referring to how our case was "leaked" whilst other clubs was kept quiet until the decision had been made.

My money is on the Scouse Prick Parry.

 

[TinFoilHat]

Sky Sports News going into fear mongering mode on behalf of the PL over the regulation bill.

 

[cheekybids]

?

Sorry I’ll be clearer……

Premier league & City were trying to keep it confidential & yet the Daily Mail went to court so they could report on it. Clearly someone tipped off the daily mail…. Who?

Parry
Gill
Levy

 

[halfcenturyup]

I remember the judge ruling on that after the Daily Mail, I think, stuck its oar in.
One of our legally savvy number can probably clarify this, but why did both sides want everything heard in private? What would have been the benefit for City? What would have been the benefit for the PL?

Also, on an entirely different matter, whilst an email is just evidence of an email, would there actually have been anything wrong with the AD Executive Authority covering the £59m balance of the Etihad deal?

Nothing wrong at all, but the allegation was that ADUG had paid it.

As to why both parties wanted the investigation to be private, I didn't pay much attention to those procedings. I suppose the answer is in the documentation. I may have a look later.