cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,619
The cantilever stand (now the GPC Stand) was gifted to them for the 1966 World Cup.
Old Trafford was gifted to them, their Sugar daddy was ok though.
The cantilever stand (now the GPC Stand) was gifted to them for the 1966 World Cup.
Really good points but you’ve missed off the wider positive impact the club has had on the city of Manchester in terms of its global image which has benefited the conurbation in respect of inward investment and tourism in the billions of pounds. This is undeniable and overwhelms any petty, small-time arguments around the stadium, our occupation of which was key to the takeover.All true (and conveniently ignored by media herberts such as this tosser; 'Herbert' by name, 'herbert' by nature..). To expand on your post:
(a) No guaranteed football involvement, no stadium built (initially, it was offered to the Red Filth across town but they declined, 'preferring to develop Old Toilet'.. that turned out well, didn't it?)
(b) No agreement with City from the start, no stadium built and no successful Commonwealth Games in Manchester 2002.
(c) No successful Commonwealth Games in Manchester 2002, no Olympics in London 2012. Definite.
(d) City pay rent a-plenty to the local council as you say and also developed the ground by completing the full North stand and digging out the athletics track to reveal the lower layer and the full stadium (I understand this cost met by City taking out the bond of £25M approx. onto the club's financial books).
(e) Manchester Council took over and sold Maine Road to developers, earning north of £20M in the process towards council funds, so I understand?
(f) Incredible additional development of the area around the ground, transforming the wasteland that was East Manchester, again at a significant cost to the club, in excess of £220M as I understand it.
(g) South stand development also completed, with the North stand extension underway too. All costs once again being met by the club.
So..
A 'free stadium' like with the West Ham situation, when an incompetent, desperate set of government buffoons threw everything, every possible incentive at a football club to take a 'White Elephant' off its hands?
Do me a favour, Herbert.. just get to f**k with your partial, snide articles.
Pure wank.Someone watching blue moon forum.
He assumes that our criticism of critics of the club is based on love for the owner not the club or any legitimate criticism of the the criticismsThe fact that Abu Dhabi has faced more criticism since would shows it’s failed if it was a sports washing project….
Financially it’s been a winner so if it was sportswashing they’d have cashed out….
Further evidence it was a flawed argument from glory hunting Dipper fans that believe they are victims… your just not allowed to say it.
It starts from the totally false premise that the UAE had a terrible reputation prior to the takeover and that buying us was a cynical attempt to 'sportswash' that.He assumes that our criticism of critics of the club is based on love for the owner not the club or any legitimate criticism of the the criticisms
lol, why write gap when you can use ‘lacuna’? Stopped reading after that tbh.Someone watching blue moon forum.
Bit late on here today but has anyone else listened to the latest edition of The Times football podcast which dropped today?
Martin Samuel a pleasure to listen to, talking about what the whole FFP notion is really all about. Brilliant to listen to.