Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
Prestwich_Blue said:
I'll help you.

He's trying to say Manchester City are owned by vulgar, brown-skinned people, who made their fortune from the carbon products that the Guardian and its readers hates. The fact that these vulgar brown-skinned people have actually done a rather good job of that ownership makes it worse, because they're supposed to be uncultured people who just throw money at things.

Rather than being owned by a white-skinned guy who made his money renting out TV's, making bog roll or selling over priced leisurewear. Or an American chancer, who doesn't risk putting in his own money but uses money from others and takes out dividends or consultancy fees. Neither do they enrich the community around their stadium.

And because we're owned by these vulgar, uncultured Arabs, we can't enjoy our successes as much, compared to if we were owned by a white Anglo-Saxon/Jewish businessman.

Hope that explains things.
Click to expand...
200.gif
 
Stiff Little Wingers said:
Very good post. Wonder why he doesn't use the Rags where the fans have been campaigning against the owners as soon as they stopped winning?
Click to expand...

The Glazers...

Joel-and-Avram-Glazer.jpg


Sheikh Mansour and Khaldoon...

web-final-1-a17q1096.ashx


Spot the difference.
 
Eccles Blue said:
When I was younger the Guardian was my daily paper of choice. At that time it felt more neutral and balanced than the others (plus the fact that Tuesday was Education jobs day ;-)) and I enjoyed doing the Quick Crossword as my evening wind down after work.
Nowadays I just do the crossword online and leave the rest!! How the mighty have fallen. Once the proud MANCHESTER GUARDIAN, now the slimy Guardian. JMHO
Click to expand...
John crace is worth the effort.
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
It’s a racist narrative. The campaign of hate is confined to our owner because of his ethnicity. Apparently he can’t invest his own money. Everything he does is geopolitical. If this sort of hate was applied to Jewish owner, eg blaming him for everything Israel does, it would be rightly condemned as anti-Semitic.
Click to expand...
When United are eventually petro funded all this nonsense will fade away
 
bluemanchester said:
The Grimsby chairmans insecurity comes about because he is Chairman of a football club in a town, Grimsby, that is forever in the shadow of Hull and they can't even talk properly in Hull so no wonder he is a little bitter. I bet his father in law laughs his socks off at his son in laws inadequacies.
Click to expand...
The fact that he’s not even asked his father-in-law after 6 to 7 weeks tells you all you need to know. He‘s been disowned or has a real chip against him.
 
bluemanchester said:
The Grimsby chairmans insecurity comes about because he is Chairman of a football club in a town, Grimsby, that is forever in the shadow of Hull and they can't even talk properly in Hull so no wonder he is a little bitter. I bet his father in law laughs his socks off at his son in laws inadequacies.
Click to expand...
I bet his father in law has to remind said chairman every day that the club is in CLEETHORPES not Grimsby.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.