Media Discussion - 2023/24

[mancboy]

But isn't this a case of two neighbours fighting over a hedge, more money than sense and the lawyers will get their fee.

No this is a case of proving that the premier league are liars who work at the behest of a cadre of red tops and this was nothing more than a shot at us to cause us reputational damage and try to make our achievements look like it was because we were cheating , rather than address their own issues with bad management, as i have said before its yank business practice 101, when you cant compete then your litigate.

 

[tweety]

No this is a case of proving that the premier league are liars who work at the behest of a cadre of red tops and this was nothing more than a shot at us to cause us reputational damage and try to make our achievements look like it was because we were cheating , rather than address their own issues with bad management, as i have said before its yank business practice 101, when you cant compete then your litigate.

I agree with your post 100%. The point was that the lawyers would take the case even if there was only a tiny chance of success. It's a nice fee.

 

[Citizen of Legoland]

Who put that on there?

 

[Since 76]

Some knob on sly sports has just said that he thinks West Ham had the best year last year!

 

[bluedave1894]

View attachment 103158

Who put that on there?

Casemiro.

 

[The perfect fumble]

Some knob on sly sports has just said that he thinks West Ham had the best year last year!

Dildos were up in 2023...

 

[mancboy]

I agree with your post 100%. The point was that the lawyers would take the case even if there was only a tiny chance of success. It's a nice fee.

i think it very much depends on the lawyer and what level they are at, a qc like pannick does not need the fee , the damage to his reputation from taking cases with little to no chance of success would be worth much more than any fee he would receive.

 

[The perfect fumble]

i think it very much depends on the lawyer and what level they are at, a qc like pannick does not need the fee , the damage to his reputation from taking cases with little to no chance of success would be worth much more than any fee he would receive.

This is the man who defended Boris Johnson over Partygate.

It didn't end well.

 

[mancboy]

This is the man who defended Boris Johnson over Partygate.

It didn't end well.

Fair play, its easy to pick one case where it didnt end well but then ignore the 100s it did, you dont get to the level that he is at without enough credibility to back it up.

 

[Platt Lane 59]

United’s 7 in a row would have been reported differently though because they did it without spending money and playing the beautiful game the United way

Don't forget that all the team were either born & bred in Salford, or they had supported the Trafford Termites from afar, since they were nippers...