Someone should tell sky and the beeb to go and read page 164 of the officail summary of the hearing, that was realeased yesterday. It. states that their rules are deemed unlawful. They also state that also certain club's, and we all know who they are, wanted the Premier league to treat all the middle Eastern sponsors to a different standard. Not only unlawful but racist.and some people still think the BBC is a credible source of information. If they'll twist the story for something as trivial as this then how can you believe anything else the say?
Not sure where anyone gets the idea Jordan was attacking us there in that segment. I almost put the you tube channel on to see if he was clad in the Noel Gallagher kit.Jordan was the one calling it a City win as Stefan called it a score draw.
Well he's changed his tune. Anyway the wind blows.!Jordan was the one calling it a City win as Stefan called it a score draw.
Think Stefan steered Jordan nicely into accusing the PL of failing & claiming a City win.Stefans wasting his time going on Talk Sport.
The pundits and their audience don't have the intelligence to dissect and understand any judgement like yesterday's.
Jordan is so wrapped up in bias and his hate for City, we're a Frankenstein club remember !!
And Jim White is just there to stoke the fire and get people annoyed so they ring in.
Facts and honest opinion don't really come into it.
I was absolutely flabbergasted that I was finding myself agreeing with most of what he said.Jordan was the one calling it a City win as Stefan called it a score draw.
agreed...Stefan was being magnanimous in victory, and Jordan was reduced to arguing with himself, flapping around like a fish on the dock...Think Stefan steered Jordan nicely into accusing the PL of failing & claiming a City win.
Job done
I don't know, Stefan claimed we wouldn't win this case originally. Last week he played down the meeting change and now he is describing it as a score draw. Nice to hear Jordan pushing the city win narrative, maybe Stefan wants that rather than being accused of bias but ultimately his thoughts on it arent as strong in our favour as they should be, on this topic.Think Stefan steered Jordan nicely into accusing the PL of failing & claiming a City win.
Job done
Doesn't suit the Red Cartel Sheeple narrative...Someone should tell sky and the beeb to go and read page 164 of the officail summary of the hearing, that was realeased yesterday. It. states that their rules are deemed unlawful. They also state that also certain club's, and we all know who they are, wanted the Premier league to treat all the middle Eastern sponsors to a different standard. Not only unlawful but racist.
I don't listen to Talk Sport much these days. I find Jordan verbose and partial. There is no balance on his show. So I will have to take your word for it?Think Stefan steered Jordan nicely into accusing the PL of failing & claiming a City win.
Job done
I did hear that bit earlier in the summer. He said we didn't have much of a chance at winning much if anything, we had a weak case in his opinion. Clearly the wrong position.I don't know, Stefan claimed we wouldn't win this case originally. Last week he played down the meeting change and now he is describing it as a score draw. Nice to hear Jordan pushing the city win narrative, maybe Stefan wants that rather than being accused of bias but ultimately his thoughts on it arent as strong in our favour as they should be, on this topic.