Not sure if you misunderstood my post or not tbh
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Media discussion - 2024/25
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
115 has now become accepted as "normal" language and just a bit of fun and banter. Many people just refer to City as "115 . I don't regard it as acceptable never mind funny.How sad you really are. I thought it was as funny as fuck. I`d hate to be out with you as you must be a barrel of laughs.
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
How sad.115 has now become accepted as "normal" language and just a bit of fun and banter. Many people just refer to City as "115 . I don't regard it as acceptable never mind funny.
P
P
PPT
Guest
You are correct. It is now accepted as normal.115 has now become accepted as "normal" language and just a bit of fun and banter. Many people just refer to City as "115 . I don't regard it as acceptable never mind funny.
In her match report on yesterday's game, Alyson Rudd of The Times shoehorned this into the very last paragraph:
"Meanwhile, anyone who doubts that Guardiola has the appetite for yet another campaign especially with the phantom of the 115 charges that loiter in the shadows and could result in a significant points deduction,"
Why? It has no relevance to the game or her match report whatsoever. However, it is clear that in her thinking, a reference to the 115 charges cannot be omitted. It is now obligatory.
Yep, I know it is Alyson Rudd, but it is now standard on any article, in virtually any newspaper or media coverage of City.
Always comes across as fair, I'm sure he is on one of the US channels doing football and talks a good game as well.Fjortoft always seemed pro united, and a bit anti city to me, but he seems to have mellowed a bit since Haaland joined
View attachment 128756
but it is just banter and funny as fuck, just ask @oakiecokieYou are correct. It is now accepted as normal.
In her match report on yesterday's game, Alyson Rudd of The Times shoehorned this into the very last paragraph:
"Meanwhile, anyone who doubts that Guardiola has the appetite for yet another campaign especially with the phantom of the 115 charges that loiter in the shadows and could result in a significant points deduction,"
Why? It has no relevance to the game or her match report whatsoever. However, it is clear that in her thinking, a reference to the 115 charges cannot be omitted. It is now obligatory.
Yep, I know it is Alyson Rudd, but it is now standard on any article, in virtually any newspaper or media coverage of City.
mexico1970
Well-Known Member
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Does my head in people who can`t take a joke and they say us FOC are miserable bastards.but it is just banter and funny as fuck, just ask @oakiecokie
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
No doubt that will upset ... some City fans. ;)
BlueMoonRisin’
Well-Known Member
Sterling is getting slated from Chelsea fans on Talk sport, one guy said he's the worst player to play for them in 10 seasons. Ouch!