Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 17,628
- Team supported
- Manchester City
You are correct. It is now accepted as normal.
In her match report on yesterday's game, Alyson Rudd of The Times shoehorned this into the very last paragraph:
"Meanwhile, anyone who doubts that Guardiola has the appetite for yet another campaign especially with the phantom of the 115 charges that loiter in the shadows and could result in a significant points deduction,"
Why? It has no relevance to the game or her match report whatsoever. However, it is clear that in her thinking, a reference to the 115 charges cannot be omitted. It is now obligatory.
Yep, I know it is Alyson Rudd, but it is now standard on any article, in virtually any newspaper or media coverage of City.
Based upon her history she would have totally relished the opportunity to reference the charges - the woman is another knownowt dipper-loving **** who hates City because of their level of success.