Think it was Jack Gaughan doing the team ratings who gave Wolves a total of 74 compared to 69 for City, despite the fact we had 18 corners, 22 shots, 7 on target.To be fair, it was our 18 corner of the match. We were bound to get one right eventually
Does he really? He seems to spend an awful lot of time broadcasting from what I thought were London-based studios, so I l’m genuinely surprised by that. Maybe he’s got a new partner/family up here.Matterface lives in East Didsbury. He must socialise with some of the plastic ones.
SkySports have had an absolute shocker the past couple of days. Sue Smith another example today. Embarrassing.
The Premier League need to think about awarding rights to broadcasters who can fairly convey the rules of the game rather than just the highest bidder.
I noticed even that gobby slapper Sheban Ohearn said it was a fair goal & you dont get many more one eyed bitter rags than her.Talksport have been decent I'd say. To a man saying the goal should have stood. We can't have any complaints on that front.
He occasionally does his shows from his flat.Does he really? He seems to spend an awful lot of time broadcasting from what I thought were London-based studios, so I l’m genuinely surprised by that. Maybe he’s got a new partner/family up here.
Matterface lives in East Didsbury. He must socialise with the plastic one.
They'd simply be delighted that you were engaged enough to complain. It's done its job if you're talking about itI never complain to any of these companies as they don't take any notice but today I was tempted to complain about Sue Smith. Her stubborn refusal to accept the decision regarding our goal was correct was both embarrassing and unprofessional. Even staunch Liverpool fan Warnock was baffled at her refusal to accept it.
West Didsbury/Withington.Matterface lives in East Didsbury. He must socialise with some of the plastic ones.
VAR checks all goals, so they won't have been asked to look at something specific just the whole thingI’m a little confused with all this. Was it referred to VAR because Silva was adjudged to be in an offside position and interfering with play? Or, was it because he was impeding the goalkeeper? If it’s interfering with play, when the ball was headed, he was nowhere near the goalkeeper, if he was allegedly impeding the goalkeeper, some very short memories out there, take a look at the fixture v Arsenal, a month ago and their second goal and what the hell is that if that isn’t impeding the goalkeeper, then I don’t know that is. I remember on MoTD, them saying Ederson “had to be stronger”. Those Arsenal players are big lads. Bernardo Silva is what? 5’7”, 10 stone wet through? Then the Wolves goalie had to be stronger. No, all hell to pay because it’s City. The referee’s decision was correct, so sod the Monday talk sport and Sky inquest and if, just if, Pep gets asked about it in the next premier managers media questions he gets pre armed with some facts.